Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Letter re: Evaluation of hyperacute infarct volume using ASPECTS and brain CT perfusion core volume

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/Letter to the editorAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Demeestere et al. found no significant difference between the accuracy of Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) or CT perfusion to identify ischemic stroke patients with a diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) lesion of at least 70 mL, although CT perfusion with a core volume of 50 mL was more accurate than ASPECTS with an optimal cutoff value of less than 7.
Due to the retrospective observational design of this study,1 no treatment effect (i.e., clinical efficacy) could be assessed. Because of the wide inclusion period and limited number of patients (59 patients in 8.5 years),1 selection bias was very likely.
Another limitation of this study is that thrombolytic treatment was started between CT and MRI, and that last modality was performed within 100 minutes after CT perfusion.1 While thrombolytic agents can rapidly decrease the clot, delay between both imaging modalities and interim administration of thrombolysis could influence MRI diffusion lesion volume.
[...]
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2397-2398
Number of pages2
JournalNeurology
Volume89
Issue number23
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 5 Dec 2017

Bibliographical note

© 2017 American Academy of Neurology.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Letter re: Evaluation of hyperacute infarct volume using ASPECTS and brain CT perfusion core volume'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this