Limited effect of neuritic plaques on neuronal density in the hippocampal CA1 area of Alzheimer patients

A Salehi, J M Bakker, M Mulder, D F Swaab

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademic

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) and neuritic plaques (NPs) are the classic neuropathological hallmarks of Alzheimer disease (AD). It is generally assumed that the pathogenic process of AD could start by local neurotoxicity induced by the beta-amyloid core of plaques, followed by the appearance of NFTs and eventually cell death. To determine whether or not local neurotoxicity around NPs is indeed a major pathogenetic mechanism, we used an image analysis system to measure the neuronal density around Bodian-stained NPs in the hippocampal CA1 area of eight AD patients. Neuronal density, as measured within two arbitrary concentric circles around NPs with a radius of 74 and 123.5 microm, respectively, was on average 19% and 16% lower than the density in similar control circles without NPs in the same section. Furthermore, neuronal density around NPs was inversely related to their size. To investigate the impact of such a local reduction in cell density around NPs on the entire CA1 area, we also determined the proportion of the CA1 covered by the NPs and the arbitrary concentric circles around them. This appeared to be 16.3% of the total CA1 area, which means that the negative effect of NPs on the cell density can only explain 2.6% of cell death in the entire CA area. In conclusion, this study suggests that although NPs have a local negative effect on neighboring neurons, their contribution to the strong decrease in CA1 cell numbers is limited.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)77-82
Number of pages6
JournalAlzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders
Volume12
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 1998
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Limited effect of neuritic plaques on neuronal density in the hippocampal CA1 area of Alzheimer patients'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this