Abstract
Abstract Happiness and utility are two types of subjective well-being, but measured in different ways. Happiness is measured by asking people questions about their subjective appreciation of their life as a whole. Utility is measured by an assessment of their subjective priorities, as revealed in their actual behaviour. Both methods have specific pros and cons and additional value. These methodological issues are important in an epistemological way: how to obtain knowledge about subjective well-being. There are, however, also three important ontological differences between happiness and utility in the actual nature of these phenomena in reality. (1) Happiness depends on available market and nonmarket commodities and living-conditions; utility depends only on available marketcommodities.
(2) Happiness is about experienced well-being, utility is about expected
well-being. (3) Happiness is limited because it is related to the fulfilment of a limited
number of needs, utility is unlimited because behaviour always reveals preferences in terms of expected well-being. Economists and happiness-researchers tend to neglect the last two differences. Their analysis, the analysis of Carol Graham included, could gain strength if more attention would be paid to these last two differences.
Keywords Subjective well-being Utility Revealed preferences Happiness
Self-reported happiness Needs and Wants
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 519-524 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | Journal of Happiness Studies |
| Volume | 12 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2010 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Research programs
- ESSB SOC
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Limited experienced happiness or unlimited expected utility, what about the differences?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver