Litigating Federalism: An Empirical Analysis of Decisions of the Belgian Constitutional Court

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

20 Citations (Scopus)

6 Downloads (Pure)

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	305-346
Number of pages	41
Journal	European Constitutional Law Review
Volume	13
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1017/S1574019617000050
Publication status	Published - 2017

Research programs

@article{630a70f740ce4cbf94e6b3af62ea9441,

title = "Litigating Federalism: An Empirical Analysis of Decisions of the Belgian Constitutional Court",

author = "\{Dalla Pelligrina\}, L and \{De Mot\}, J and Michael Faure and N Garoupa",

year = "2017",

doi = "10.1017/S1574019617000050",

language = "English",

volume = "13",

pages = "305--346",

journal = "European Constitutional Law Review",

issn = "1574-0196",

publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Litigating Federalism: An Empirical Analysis of Decisions of the Belgian Constitutional Court

AU - Dalla Pelligrina, L

AU - De Mot, J

AU - Faure, Michael

AU - Garoupa, N

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

U2 - 10.1017/S1574019617000050

DO - 10.1017/S1574019617000050

M3 - Article

SN - 1574-0196

VL - 13

SP - 305

EP - 346

JO - European Constitutional Law Review

JF - European Constitutional Law Review

IS - 2

ER -