Long-term Results of a Randomized Double-blinded Prospective Trial of a Lightweight (Ultrapro) Versus a Heavyweight Mesh (Prolene) in Laparoscopic Total Extraperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair (TULP-trial)

JPJ Burgmans, CEH Voorbrood, RKJ Simmermacher, N Schouten, N Smakman, G Clevers, PHP Davids, EMM Verleisdonk, ME Hamaker, Johan Lange, T van Dalen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

43 Citations (Scopus)


Objective:The aim of the randomized clinical trial was to compare the 2 years of clinical outcomes of a lightweight (Ultrapro) vs a heavyweight (Prolene) mesh for laparoscopic total extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair.Background:Lightweight meshes reduce postoperative pain and stiffness in open anterior inguinal hernia repair. The discussion about a similar benefit for laparoscopic repair is ongoing, but concerns exist about higher recurrence rates.Methods:Between March 2010 and October 2012, male patients who presented with a primary, reducible unilateral inguinal hernia who underwent day-case TEP repair were eligible. Outcome parameters included chronic pain, recurrence, foreign body feeling, and quality of life scores.Results:During the study period, 950 patients were included. One year postoperatively the presence of relevant pain (Numeric Rating Score 4-10) was significantly higher in the lightweight mesh group (2.9%) compared with the heavyweight mesh group (0.7%) (P = 0.01), and after 2 years this difference remained significant (P = 0.03). There were 4 (0.8%) recurrent hernias in the heavyweight mesh group and 13 (2.7%) in the lightweight group (P = 0.03). No differences in foreign body feeling or quality of life scores were detected.Conclusions:In TEP hernia surgery, there was no benefit of lightweight over heavyweight meshes observed 2 years postoperatively.
Original languageUndefined/Unknown
Pages (from-to)862-866
Number of pages5
JournalAnnals of Surgery
Issue number5
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Cite this