TY - JOUR
T1 - Low socioeconomic status is a risk factor for preeclampsia: the Generation R Study
AU - Silva, Lindsay
AU - Coolman, Marianne
AU - Steegers, Eric
AU - Jaddoe, Vincent
AU - Moll, Henriette
AU - Hofman, Bert
AU - Mackenbach, Johan
AU - Raat, Hein
PY - 2008
Y1 - 2008
N2 - Objectives To examine whether maternal socioeconomic status, as indicated by maternal educational level, is associated with preeclampsia, and if so, to what extent known risk factors for preeclampsia mediate the effect of educational level. Methods In the Generation R Study, a population-based cohort study, we examined data of 3547 pregnant women. Odds ratios of preeclampsia for low, mid-low and mid-high educational level compared with high educational level were calculated after adjustment for confounders and additional adjustment for a selection of potential mediators (family history, material factors, psychosocial factors, substance use, working conditions, preexisting medical conditions, maternal anthropometrics and blood pressure at enrolment) that individually caused more than 10% change in the odds ratio for low education. Results Adjusted for the confounding effects of age, gravidity and multiple pregnancy, women with low educational level were more likely to develop preeclampsia (odds ratio 5.12; 95% confidence interval: 2.20, 11.93) than women with high educational level. After additional adjustment for financial difficulties, smoking in pregnancy, working conditions, body mass index and blood pressure at enrolment, the odds ratio was 4.91 (95% confidence interval: 1.93, 12.52). Conclusion Low maternal socioeconomic status is a strong risk factor for preeclampsia. Only a small part of this association can be explained by the mediating effects of established risk factors for preeclampsia. Further research is needed to disentangle the pathway from low socioeconomic status to preeclampsia.
AB - Objectives To examine whether maternal socioeconomic status, as indicated by maternal educational level, is associated with preeclampsia, and if so, to what extent known risk factors for preeclampsia mediate the effect of educational level. Methods In the Generation R Study, a population-based cohort study, we examined data of 3547 pregnant women. Odds ratios of preeclampsia for low, mid-low and mid-high educational level compared with high educational level were calculated after adjustment for confounders and additional adjustment for a selection of potential mediators (family history, material factors, psychosocial factors, substance use, working conditions, preexisting medical conditions, maternal anthropometrics and blood pressure at enrolment) that individually caused more than 10% change in the odds ratio for low education. Results Adjusted for the confounding effects of age, gravidity and multiple pregnancy, women with low educational level were more likely to develop preeclampsia (odds ratio 5.12; 95% confidence interval: 2.20, 11.93) than women with high educational level. After additional adjustment for financial difficulties, smoking in pregnancy, working conditions, body mass index and blood pressure at enrolment, the odds ratio was 4.91 (95% confidence interval: 1.93, 12.52). Conclusion Low maternal socioeconomic status is a strong risk factor for preeclampsia. Only a small part of this association can be explained by the mediating effects of established risk factors for preeclampsia. Further research is needed to disentangle the pathway from low socioeconomic status to preeclampsia.
U2 - 10.1097/HJH.0b013e3282fcc36e
DO - 10.1097/HJH.0b013e3282fcc36e
M3 - Article
VL - 26
SP - 1200
EP - 1208
JO - Journal of Hypertension
JF - Journal of Hypertension
SN - 0263-6352
IS - 6
ER -