Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Machine learning-based mortality prediction models using national liver transplantation registries are feasible but have limited utility across countries

  • Tommy Ivanics
  • , Delvin So
  • , Marco P A W Claasen
  • , David Wallace
  • , Madhukar S Patel
  • , Annabel Gravely
  • , Woo Jin Choi
  • , Chaya Shwaartz
  • , Kate Walker
  • , Lauren Erdman
  • , Gonzalo Sapisochin
  • Uppsala University
  • The Hospital for Sick Children
  • King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
  • University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
  • University Health Network
  • Department of Nephrology and Transplantation Medicine

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

20 Citations (Scopus)
16 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Many countries curate national registries of liver transplant (LT) data. These registries are often used to generate predictive models; however, potential performance and transferability of these models remain unclear. We used data from 3 national registries and developed machine learning algorithm (MLA)-based models to predict 90-day post-LT mortality within and across countries. Predictive performance and external validity of each model were assessed. Prospectively collected data of adult patients (aged ≥18 years) who underwent primary LTs between January 2008 and December 2018 from the Canadian Organ Replacement Registry (Canada), National Health Service Blood and Transplantation (United Kingdom), and United Network for Organ Sharing (United States) were used to develop MLA models to predict 90-day post-LT mortality. Models were developed using each registry individually (based on variables inherent to the individual databases) and using all 3 registries combined (variables in common between the registries [harmonized]). The model performance was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve. The number of patients included was as follows: Canada, n = 1214; the United Kingdom, n = 5287; and the United States, n = 59,558. The best performing MLA-based model was ridge regression across both individual registries and harmonized data sets. Model performance diminished from individualized to the harmonized registries, especially in Canada (individualized ridge: AUROC, 0.74; range, 0.73-0.74; harmonized: AUROC, 0.68; range, 0.50-0.73) and US (individualized ridge: AUROC, 0.71; range, 0.70-0.71; harmonized: AUROC, 0.66; range, 0.66-0.66) data sets. External model performance across countries was poor overall. MLA-based models yield a fair discriminatory potential when used within individual databases. However, the external validity of these models is poor when applied across countries. Standardization of registry-based variables could facilitate the added value of MLA-based models in informing decision making in future LTs.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)64-71
Number of pages8
JournalAmerican Journal of Transplantation
Volume23
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2023

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 American Society of Transplantation & American Society of Transplant Surgeons

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Machine learning-based mortality prediction models using national liver transplantation registries are feasible but have limited utility across countries'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this