Magnetic resonance imaging of the small bowel with the true FISP sequence: intra- and interobserver agreement of enteroclysis and imaging without contrast material

BM Wiarda; K Horsthuis; AC Dobben; RWF Geenen; MA Heitbrink; W Moolenaar; Ernst Kuipers; J Stoker

doi:10.1016/j.clinimag.2008.11.005

Magnetic resonance imaging of the small bowel with the true FISP sequence: intra- and interobserver agreement of enteroclysis and imaging without contrast material

BM Wiarda, K Horsthuis, AC Dobben, RWF Geenen, MA Heitbrink, W Moolenaar, Ernst Kuipers, J Stoker

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to determine the reliability of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) without luminal contrast medium versus MR enteroclysis for evaluating small bowel pathology, to compare MRI and MRE findings per observer, and to compare these findings with those of an expert reader in order to determine the influence of luminal contrast medium on morphological evaluations. Conclusion: The use of luminal contrast medium bowel improves reliability for measuring bowel wall thickness and for the diagnosis and grading of obstruction when evaluating the small bowel. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Original language	Undefined/Unknown
Pages (from-to)	267-273
Number of pages	7
Journal	Clinical Imaging
Volume	33
Issue number	4
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2008.11.005
Publication status	Published - 2009

Research programs

EMC MM-04-20-01

Access to Document

10.1016/j.clinimag.2008.11.005

http://hdl.handle.net/1765/24306

Cite this

@article{979c344e37764a25a256559c4c365453,

title = "Magnetic resonance imaging of the small bowel with the true FISP sequence: intra- and interobserver agreement of enteroclysis and imaging without contrast material",

abstract = "Purpose: This study aimed to determine the reliability of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) without luminal contrast medium versus MR enteroclysis for evaluating small bowel pathology, to compare MRI and MRE findings per observer, and to compare these findings with those of an expert reader in order to determine the influence of luminal contrast medium on morphological evaluations. Conclusion: The use of luminal contrast medium bowel improves reliability for measuring bowel wall thickness and for the diagnosis and grading of obstruction when evaluating the small bowel. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.",

author = "BM Wiarda and K Horsthuis and AC Dobben and RWF Geenen and MA Heitbrink and W Moolenaar and Ernst Kuipers and J Stoker",

year = "2009",

doi = "10.1016/j.clinimag.2008.11.005",

language = "Undefined/Unknown",

volume = "33",

pages = "267--273",

journal = "Clinical Imaging",

issn = "0899-7071",

publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Magnetic resonance imaging of the small bowel with the true FISP sequence: intra- and interobserver agreement of enteroclysis and imaging without contrast material

AU - Wiarda, BM

AU - Horsthuis, K

AU - Dobben, AC

AU - Geenen, RWF

AU - Heitbrink, MA

AU - Moolenaar, W

AU - Kuipers, Ernst

AU - Stoker, J

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - Purpose: This study aimed to determine the reliability of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) without luminal contrast medium versus MR enteroclysis for evaluating small bowel pathology, to compare MRI and MRE findings per observer, and to compare these findings with those of an expert reader in order to determine the influence of luminal contrast medium on morphological evaluations. Conclusion: The use of luminal contrast medium bowel improves reliability for measuring bowel wall thickness and for the diagnosis and grading of obstruction when evaluating the small bowel. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

AB - Purpose: This study aimed to determine the reliability of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) without luminal contrast medium versus MR enteroclysis for evaluating small bowel pathology, to compare MRI and MRE findings per observer, and to compare these findings with those of an expert reader in order to determine the influence of luminal contrast medium on morphological evaluations. Conclusion: The use of luminal contrast medium bowel improves reliability for measuring bowel wall thickness and for the diagnosis and grading of obstruction when evaluating the small bowel. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

U2 - 10.1016/j.clinimag.2008.11.005

DO - 10.1016/j.clinimag.2008.11.005

M3 - Article

SN - 0899-7071

VL - 33

SP - 267

EP - 273

JO - Clinical Imaging

JF - Clinical Imaging

IS - 4

ER -