Male-female differences in acute thoracic aortic dissection: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Frederike Meccanici, Arjen L. Gökalp, Carlijn G.E. Thijssen, Mostafa M. Mokhles, Jos A. Bekkers, Roland Van Kimmenade, Hence J. Verhagen, Jolien W. Roos-Hesselink, Johanna J.M. Takkenberg*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

26 Citations (Scopus)
36 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to systematically review published literature on male-female differences in presentation, management and outcomes in patients diagnosed with acute thoracic aortic dissection (AD). METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted for studies published between 1 January 1999 and 19 October 2020 investigating mortality and morbidity in adult patients diagnosed with AD. Patient and treatment characteristics were compared with odds ratios (ORs) and standardized mean differences and a meta-analysis using a random-effects model was performed for early mortality. Overall survival and reoperation were visualized by pooled Kaplan-Meier curves. RESULTS: Nine studies investigating type A dissections (AD-A), 1 investigating type B dissections (AD-B) and 3 investigating both AD-A and AD-B were included encompassing 18 659 patients. Males were younger in both AD-A (P < 0.001) and AD-B (P < 0.001), and in AD-A patients males had more distally extended dissections [OR 0.57, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.46-0.70; P < 0.001]. Longer operation times were observed for males in AD-A (standardized mean difference 0.29, 95% CI 0.17-0.41; P < 0.001) while male patients were less often treated conservatively in AD-B (OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.58-0.72; P < 0.001). The pooled early mortality risk ratio for males versus females was 0.94 (95% CI 0.84-1.06, P = 0.308) in AD-A and 0.92 (95% CI 0.83-1.03, P = 0.143) in AD-B. Pooled overall mortality in AD-A showed no male-female difference, whereas male patients had more reinterventions during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review shows male-female differences in AD patient and treatment characteristics, comparable early and overall mortality and inconsistent outcome reporting. As published literature is scarce and heterogeneous, large prospective studies with standardized reporting of male-female characteristics and outcomes are clearly warranted. Improved knowledge of male-female differences in AD will help shape optimal individualized care for both males and females. Clinical registration number: PROSPERO, ID number: CRD42020155926.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)616-627
Number of pages12
JournalInteractive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery
Volume34
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2022

Bibliographical note

Funding
This study was supported by The Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development ZonMW [849200014].

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Author(s). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Male-female differences in acute thoracic aortic dissection: A systematic review and meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this