Management strategies for patients with advanced rectal cancer and liver metastases using modified Delphi methodology: results from the PelvEx Collaborative

M. E. Kelly, Aalbers Agj, N. Abdul Aziz, N. Abecasis, M. Abraham-Nordling, T. Akiyoshi, W. Alberda, M. Albert, M. Andric, E. Angenete, A. Antoniou, R. Auer, K. K. Austin, O. Aziz, R. P. Baker, M. Bali, G. Baseckas, B. Bebington, B. K. Bednarski, G. L. BeetsP. L. Berg, J. Beynon, S. Biondo, K. Boyle, L. Bordeianou, A. B. Bremers, M. Brunner, P. Buchwald, A. Bui, A. Burgess, Burger Jwa, D. Burling, N. Campain, S. Carvalhal, L. Castro, A. Caycedo-Marulanda, Chan Kkl, G. J. Chang, M. S. Khan, H. J. Kim, H. J. Kim, H. M. Kroon, M. Kusters, M. Quinn, R. Rocha, J. Rothbarth, J. J. Smith, C. Verhoef, M. Wilson, D. C. Winter

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aim: A total of 15–20% of patients with rectal cancer have liver metastases on presentation. The management of these patients is controversial. Heterogeneity in management strategies is considerable, with management often being dependent on local resources and available expertise. Method: Members of the PelvEx Collaborative were invited to participate in the generation of a consensus statement on the optimal management of patients with advanced rectal cancer with liver involvement. Fifteen statements were created for topical discussion on diagnostic and management issues. Panellists were asked to vote on statements and anonymous feedback was given. A collaborative meeting was used to discuss any nuances and clarify any obscurity. Consensus was considered when > 85% agreement on a statement was achieved. Results: A total of 135 participants were involved in the final round of the Delphi questionnaire. Nine of the 15 statements reached consensus regarding the management of patients with advanced rectal cancer and oligometastatic liver disease. Routine use of liver MRI was not recommended for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer, unless there was concern for metastatic disease on initial computed tomography staging scan. Induction chemotherapy was advocated as first-line treatment in those with synchronous liver metastases in locally advanced rectal cancer. In the presence of symptomatic primary disease, a diverting stoma may be required to facilitate induction chemotherapy. Overall, only one-quarter of the panellists would consider simultaneous pelvic exenteration and liver resection. Conclusion: This Delphi process highlights the diverse treatment of advanced rectal cancer with liver metastases and provides recommendations from an experienced international group regarding the multidisciplinary management approach.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1184-1188
Number of pages5
JournalColorectal Disease
Volume22
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2020

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Management strategies for patients with advanced rectal cancer and liver metastases using modified Delphi methodology: results from the PelvEx Collaborative'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this