Measuring intracompartmental pressures for the chronic exertional compartment syndrome: Challenging commercially available devices and their respective accuracy

The aim of this study was to compare commercially available manometers and needles used for intracompartmental pressure measurements for accuracy. An experimental compartment simulation model was developed in order to compare four different terminal devices (Compass manometer, Stryker device, Meritrans transducer, and arterial line) and 22 types of needles. First, all possible device/needle combinations were introduced in rubber ports at the bottom of a water column. The water column was gradually drained three times for each device/needle combination and pressures were recorded by two researchers. This procedure was repeated after placement of a sample of homogenous porcine gluteal muscle tissue. When measuring the fluid column only, all Intraclass Correlation Coefficients were found to be ≥0.980, indicating good resemblance to the reference pressure. After addition of the muscle tissue to the experimental set up, accuracy of the Stryker device and arterial line remained the same. The accuracy of the Compass manometer and Meritrans transducer became less. Excellent reliability was found for 7 out of 22 needles when combined with the Stryker device and for 2 out of 22 needles when combined with the arterial line. The four terminal devices tested were all accurate when measuring pressure in a water column, whereas only the Stryker device and arterial line accurately represented the water column pressure in a porcine gluteal muscle model. Future research will have to verify whether these results can be repeated in human cadaver models and in vivo.