Medical History for Prognostic Risk Assessment and Diagnosis of Stable Patients with Suspected Coronary Artery Disease

JK Min, A Dunning, H Gransar, S Achenbach, FY Lin, M Al-Mallah, MJ Budoff, TQ Callister, HJ Chang, F. Cademartiri, E Maffei, K Chinnaiyan, BJW Chow, R D'Agostino, A Delago, J Friedman, M Hadamitzky, J Hausleiter, SW Hayes, P KaufmannGL Raff, LJ Shaw, L Thomson, T Villines, RC Cury, G Feuchtner, YJ Kim, J Leipsic, H Marques, DS Berman, M Pencina

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop a clinical cardiac risk algorithm for stable patients with suspected coronary artery disease based upon angina typicality and coronary artery disease risk factors. METHODS: Between 2004 and 2011, 14,004 adults with suspected coronary artery disease referred for cardiac imaging were followed: 1) 9093 patients for coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) followed for 2.0 years (CCTA-1); 2) 2132 patients for CCTA followed for 1.6 years (CCTA-2); and 3) 2779 patients for exercise myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS) followed for 5.0 years. A best-fit model from CCTA-1 for prediction of death or myocardial infarction was developed, with integer values proportional to regression coefficients. Discrimination was assessed using C-statistic. The validated model was tested for estimation of the likelihood of obstructive coronary artery disease, defined as >= 50% stenosis, as compared with the method of Diamond and Forrester. Primary outcomes included all-cause mortality and nonfatal myocardial infarction. Secondary outcomes included prevalent angiographically obstructive coronary artery disease. RESULTS: In CCTA-1, best-fit model discriminated individuals at risk of death or myocardial infarction (C-statistic 0.76). The integer model ranged from 3 to 13, corresponding to 3-year death risk or myocardial infarction of 0.25% to 53.8%. When applied to CCTA-2 and MPS cohorts, the model demonstrated C-statistics of 0.71 and 0.77, respectively. Both best-fit (C = 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.746-0.771) and integer models (C = 0.71; 95% CI, 0.693-0.719) performed better than Diamond and Forrester (C = 0.64; 95% CI, 0.628-0.659) for estimating obstructive coronary artery disease. CONCLUSIONS: For stable symptomatic patients with suspected coronary artery disease, we developed a history-based method for prediction of death and obstructive coronary artery disease. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Original languageUndefined/Unknown
Pages (from-to)871-878
Number of pages8
JournalAmerican Journal of Medicine
Volume128
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Cite this