Abstract
ABSTRACT There is a large literature on Member State influence in the
European Union, typically focusing on a combination of preferences of the
Member States and their strategies with an emphasis on Council negotiations.
However, prior to Council negotiations Member States also seek to influence the
Commission’s development of legislative proposals. This paper argues that
Member States need scientific expertise, experiential knowledge and target group
support to make this strategy work and that the availability of these resources is
partly shaped by domestic institutions, such as the territorial organization of the
state, the recruitment principles of governmental departments, and the structure
of government’s relationship with business groups and societal interests. As a
plausibility probe for our argument we have conducted a case study of the Dutch
government’s strategy regarding the REACH Regulation.
KEY WORDS Chemicals policy; European Commission; expertise; lobbying;
Member States; the Netherlands.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 179-197 |
Number of pages | 19 |
Journal | Journal of European Public Policy |
Volume | 19 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2012 |
Research programs
- EUR ESSB 25