Molecular surveillance of norovirus, 2005-16: an epidemiological analysis of data collected from the NoroNet network

NoroNet, Janko van Beek, Miranda de Graaf, Haider Al-Hello, David J Allen, Katia Ambert-Balay, Nadine Botteldoorn, Mia Brytting, Javier Buesa, Maria Cabrerizo, Martin Chan, Fiona Cloak, Ilaria Di Bartolo, Susana Guix, Joanne Hewitt, Nobuhiro Iritani, Miao Jin, Reimar Johne, Ingeborg Lederer, Janet MansVito Martella, Leena Maunula, Georgina McAllister, Sandra Niendorf, Hubert G Niesters, Alexander T Podkolzin, Mateja Poljsak-Prijatelj, Lasse Dam Rasmussen, Gábor Reuter, Gráinne Tuite, Annelies Kroneman, Harry Vennema, Marion P G Koopmans*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

200 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The development of a vaccine for norovirus requires a detailed understanding of global genetic diversity of noroviruses. We analysed their epidemiology and diversity using surveillance data from the NoroNet network.

METHODS: We included genetic sequences of norovirus specimens obtained from outbreak investigations and sporadic gastroenteritis cases between 2005 and 2016 in Europe, Asia, Oceania, and Africa. We genotyped norovirus sequences and analysed sequences that overlapped at open reading frame (ORF) 1 and ORF2. Additionally, we assessed the sampling date and country of origin of the first reported sequence to assess when and where novel drift variants originated.

FINDINGS: We analysed 16 635 norovirus sequences submitted between Jan 1, 2005, to Nov 17, 2016, of which 1372 (8·2%) sequences belonged to genotype GI, 15 256 (91·7%) to GII, and seven (<0·1%) to GIV.1. During this period, 26 different norovirus capsid genotypes circulated and 22 different recombinant genomes were found. GII.4 drift variants emerged with 2-3-year periodicity up to 2012, but not afterwards. Instead, the GII.4 Sydney capsid seems to persist through recombination, with a novel recombinant of GII.P16-GII.4 Sydney 2012 variant detected in 2014 in Germany (n=1) and the Netherlands (n=1), and again in 2016 in Japan (n=2), China (n=8), and the Netherlands (n=3). The novel GII.P17-GII.17, first reported in Asia in 2014, has circulated widely in Europe in 2015-16 (GII.P17 made up a highly variable proportion of all sequences in each country [median 11·3%, range 4·2-53·9], as did GII.17 [median 6·3%, range 0-44·5]). GII.4 viruses were more common in outbreaks in health-care settings (2239 [37·2%] of 6022 entries) compared with other genotypes (101 [12·5%] of 809 entries for GI and 263 [13·5%] of 1941 entries for GII non-GII.Pe-GII.4 or GII.P4-GII.4).

INTERPRETATION: Continuous changes in the global norovirus genetic diversity highlight the need for sustained global norovirus surveillance, including assessment of possible immune escape and evolution by recombination, to provide a full overview of norovirus epidemiology for future vaccine policy decisions.

FUNDING: European Union's Horizon 2020 grant COMPARE, ZonMw TOP grant, the Virgo Consortium funded by the Dutch Government, and the Hungarian Scientific Research Fund.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)545-553
Number of pages9
JournalLancet Infectious Diseases
Volume18
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2018

Bibliographical note

Funding:
European Union’s Horizon 2020 grant COMPARE, ZonMw TOP grant, the Virgo Consortium funded by the
Dutch Government, and the Hungarian Scientific Research Fund.

Role of the funding source:
The funders of the study had no role in study design,
data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, writing
of the report, or in the decision to submit for publication.
The corresponding author had full access to all data in
the study and had full responsibility for decision to
submit for publication

Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Research programs

  • EMC OR-01

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Molecular surveillance of norovirus, 2005-16: an epidemiological analysis of data collected from the NoroNet network'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this