Abstract
Objective: This study aims to determine the impact of using a prediction model for recurrent preeclampsia to customize antenatal care in subsequent pregnancies. Methods: We compared care consumption, pregnancy outcomes, and self-reported health state of two risk-based subgroups, and compared these to a reference group receiving standard care. Results: We included a total of 311 women from 12 hospitals. Compared to standard care, recurrence-risk guided care did not lead to different outcomes or self-perceived health. Conclusion: Our study exemplifies that recurrence-risk-based stratification of antenatal care in former preeclampsia patients is feasible; it does not lead to worse pregnancy outcomes.
| Original language | Undefined/Unknown |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 42-54 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | Hypertension in Pregnancy |
| Volume | 35 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2016 |
Research programs
- EMC MGC-02-52-01-A
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver