TY - JOUR
T1 - Multiplex ligation-depending probe amplification is not suitable for detection of low-grade mosaicism
AU - van Veghel-Plandsoen, MM
AU - Wouters, Cokkie
AU - Kromosoeto, Joan
AU - den Ridder-Klunnen, MC
AU - Halley, Dicky
AU - van den Ouweland, Ans
PY - 2011
Y1 - 2011
N2 - 'Apparent non-penetrance' occurs in several genetic disorders, including tuberous sclerosis complex and neurofibromatosis type 1: clinically unaffected parents may have multiple affected offspring. Germ line or somatic mosaicism in one of the parents of the index patient is the probable cause and results in an enhanced recurrence risk. Therefore, it is of great importance to use the most sensitive technology for testing DNA of the parents of the index patient for the presence/absence of the familial mutation. To detect large rearrangements multiplex ligation-depending probe amplification (MLPA) is often used. Here we show that MLPA is less sensitive in detecting low-grade somatic mosaicism than fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) or a mutation-specific PCR test. Therefore, we recommend FISH (if possible) or PCR analysis for the analysis of parental DNA. European Journal of Human Genetics (2011) 19, 1009-1012; doi: 10.1038/ejhg. 2011.60; published online 13 April 2011
AB - 'Apparent non-penetrance' occurs in several genetic disorders, including tuberous sclerosis complex and neurofibromatosis type 1: clinically unaffected parents may have multiple affected offspring. Germ line or somatic mosaicism in one of the parents of the index patient is the probable cause and results in an enhanced recurrence risk. Therefore, it is of great importance to use the most sensitive technology for testing DNA of the parents of the index patient for the presence/absence of the familial mutation. To detect large rearrangements multiplex ligation-depending probe amplification (MLPA) is often used. Here we show that MLPA is less sensitive in detecting low-grade somatic mosaicism than fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) or a mutation-specific PCR test. Therefore, we recommend FISH (if possible) or PCR analysis for the analysis of parental DNA. European Journal of Human Genetics (2011) 19, 1009-1012; doi: 10.1038/ejhg. 2011.60; published online 13 April 2011
U2 - 10.1038/ejhg.2011.60
DO - 10.1038/ejhg.2011.60
M3 - Article
C2 - 21487440
SN - 1018-4813
VL - 19
SP - 1009
EP - 1012
JO - European Journal of Human Genetics
JF - European Journal of Human Genetics
IS - 9
ER -