Mutation of NRAS but not KRAS significantly reduces myeloma sensitivity to single-agent bortezomib therapy

  • G Mulligan
  • , DI Lichter
  • , A Di Bacco
  • , SJ Blakemore
  • , A Berger
  • , E Koenig
  • , HF Bernard
  • , W Trepicchio
  • , Baoyue Li
  • , R Neuwirth
  • , N Chattopadhyay
  • , JB Bolen
  • , AJ Dorner
  • , H te Velde
  • , D Ricci
  • , S Jagannath
  • , JR Berenson
  • , PG Richardson
  • , EA Stadtmauer
  • , RZ Orlowski
  • S Lonial, KC Anderson, Pieter Sonneveld, JF San Miguel, DL Esseltine, M Schu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

111 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Various translocations and mutations have been identified in myeloma, and certain aberrations, such as t(4;14) and del17, are linked with disease prognosis. To investigate mutational prevalence in myeloma and associations between mutations and patient outcomes, we tested a panel of 41 known oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes in tumor samples from 133 relapsed myeloma patients participating in phase 2 or 3 clinical trials of bortezomib. DNA mutations were identified in 14 genes. BRAF as well as RAS genes were mutated in a large proportion of cases (45.9%) and these mutations were mutually exclusive. New recurrent mutations were also identified, including in the PDGFRA and JAK3 genes. NRAS mutations were associated with a significantly lower response rate to single-agent bortezomib (7% vs 53% in patients with mutant vs wildtype NRAS, P = .00116, Bonferroni-corrected P = .016), as well as shorter time to progression in bortezomib-treated patients (P = .0058, Bonferroni-corrected P = .012). However, NRAS mutation did not impact outcome in patients treated with high-dose dexamethasone. KRAS mutation did not reduce sensitivity to bortezomib or dexamethasone. These findings identify a significant clinical impact of NRAS mutation in myeloma and demonstrate a clear example of functional differences between the KRAS and NRAS oncogenes.
Original languageUndefined/Unknown
Pages (from-to)632-639
Number of pages8
JournalBlood
Volume123
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Research programs

  • EMC MM-02-41-03

Cite this