Abstract
Euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide are common practice in the Netherlands. In response to increasing requests from patients to end their lives, physicians are finding themselves placed in particularly precarious situations because of advance directives written by patients suffering from severe dementia. In April 2020, the Supreme Court of the Netherlands issued two judgments in the so-called Dormicum case: a case involving the deliberate termination of the life of a 74-year-old woman suffering from advanced dementia by a geriatrician in a nursing home in The Hague. The judgment of the lower criminal court was upheld, but the sanction imposed by the appellate disciplinary court was quashed. In this paper, the author reviews the two Supreme Court rulings, argues that both are fundamentally flawed and raises questions as to what they mean for Dutch criminal law, physicians, and patients going forward.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 40-53 |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| Journal | Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics |
| Volume | 31 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 20 Jan 2022 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:©
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Research programs
- ESL 98-03 capgrp Privaatr
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Mutatis mutandis ... on Euthanasia and Advanced Dementia in the Netherlands: On Euthanasia and Advanced Dementia in the Netherlands'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver