Abstract
This study assesses the results of a mandatory blended learning-program for counselors (e.g. midwives, sonographers, obstetricians) guiding national implementation of the NonInvasive Prenatal Test (NIPT). We assessed counselors' 1) knowledge about prenatal aneuploidy screening, 2) factors associated with their knowledge (e.g. counselors' characteristics, attitudes towards NIPT), and 3) counselors' attitudes regarding the blended learning. A cross-sectional online pretest-posttest implementation survey was sent to all 2,813 Dutch prenatal counselors. Multivariate linear regression analyses were performed to identify associations between counselors' knowledge and e.g. their professional backgrounds, work experience and attitudes towards NIPT. At T0 and T1 1,635 and 913 counselors completed the survey, respectively. Overall results show an increased mean number of correct answered knowledge questions; 23/35 (66%) items at T0 and 28/37 (76%) items at T1. Knowledge gaps on highly specific topics remained. Work experience and secondary care work-setting were positively associated with a higher level of knowledge. Most counselors (74%) showed positive attitudes towards the blended learning program. The mandatory blended learning, along with learning by experience through implementation of NIPT, has facilitated an increase in counselors' knowledge and was well received. New implementations in healthcare may benefit from requiring blended learning for healthcare providers, especially if tailored to professionals' learning goals.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | e0267865 |
Journal | PLoS ONE |
Volume | 17 |
Issue number | 5 May |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2 May 2022 |
Bibliographical note
Funding: This study was partly supported by a grant from the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (ZonMw, No.543002001). With regards to our Financial Disclosure we state:“This study was partly supported by a grant from the Netherlands
Organization for Health Research and Development; grant applicant LH (ZonMw, No. 543002001, https://www.zonmw.nl/nl/). The funder
had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript..
Publisher Copyright: © 2022 Martin et al.