Navigating Governance Tensions to Enhance the Impact of Partnerships with the Private Sector for the SDGs

S Pfisterer, Rob van Tulder

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Partnering with the private sector is a key modality in development cooperation to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Despite their increasing importance, such Public-Private Partnerships for Development (PPPD) experience major challenges in defining, assessing and reporting on their actual impact. This paper explores why, and how this can be improved. We engage in a qualitative synthesis review of academic, gray literature and evaluation reports of public-private programs of development agencies. We identify challenges, tensions and contradictions that affect a proper understanding and assessment of the impacts of such partnerships. The analysis shows that the main challenge in understanding and assessing impacts is the double governance logic that emerges in PPPD monitoring and evaluation (M&E). While M&E functions as an accountability and risk mitigation approach, it should also support collaborative characteristics of PPPDs such as trust and power-sharing, in order to enhance impactful PPPDs. Enhancing the impact of PPPDs for the SDGs requires bridging the divide between (a) result-based, upward accountability monitoring and evaluation approaches and (b) emerging learning, participatory and complexity-based approaches. The paper provides suggestions on how to navigate these governance tensions by using a paradoxical lens.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-17
JournalSustainability
Volume13
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2021

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.

Research programs

  • RSM ORG

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Navigating Governance Tensions to Enhance the Impact of Partnerships with the Private Sector for the SDGs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this