Abstract
As artificial intelligence (AI) becomes increasingly integrated in the military domain, calls for its regulation are growing. In this paper, I argue that although civil society, academics and citizens support the strong regulation of military AI, such regulation is unlikely to materialise, even less so via formal organisations such as NATO. The current war, in which Ukraine is defending itself against a Russian invasion, underscores three key reasons for this: blurred borders with the civilian sector; the weaponisation of civilian life; and meaningful steps towards autonomy. Given these factors, the paper argues that behavioural steps are most likely to be feasible in the short term.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 602-626 |
| Number of pages | 25 |
| Journal | Journal of Strategic Studies |
| Volume | 48 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Early online date | 21 Feb 2025 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Apr 2025 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2025 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
Research programs
- ESSB PA
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Navigating the AI frontier: Insights from the Ukraine conflict for NATO’s governance role in military AI'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver