NeuroSAFE in radical prostatectomy increases the rate of nerve-sparing surgery without affecting oncological outcome

Margaretha A. van der Slot*, Michael A. den Bakker, the Anser Prostate Cancer Network, Tamara S.C. Tan, Sebastiaan Remmers, Martijn B. Busstra, Melanie Gan, Sjoerd Klaver, John B.W. Rietbergen, Charlotte F. Kweldam, Mike Kliffen, Karen E. Hamoen, Leo M. Budel, Natascha N.T. Goemaere, Jozien Helleman, Chris H. Bangma, Monique J. Roobol, Geert J.L.H. van Leenders

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)
33 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate the impact of intra-operative neurovascular structure-adjacent frozen-section examination (NeuroSAFE) on the rate of nerve-sparing surgery (NSS) and oncological outcome in a large radical prostatectomy (RP) cohort. Patients and methods: Between January 2016 and December 2020, 1756 prostate cancer patients underwent robot-assisted RP, of whom 959 (55%) underwent this with NeuroSAFE and 797 (45%) without (control cohort). In cases where NeuroSAFE showed tumour in the margin, a secondary resection was performed. The effect of NeuroSAFE on NSS and positive surgical margin (PSM) status was analysed using logistic regression. Cox regression was used to identify predictors of biochemical recurrence-free survival (BCRFS). Results and limitations: Patients in the NeuroSAFE cohort had a higher tumour grade (P < 0.001) and clinical stage (P < 0.001) than those in the control cohort. NeuroSAFE enabled more frequent NSS for both pT2 (93% vs 76%; P < 0.001) and pT3 disease (83% vs 55%; P < 0.001). In adjusted analysis, NeuroSAFE resulted in more frequent unilateral (odds ratio [OR] 3.90, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.90–5.30; P < 0.001) and bilateral (OR 5.22, 95% CI 3.90–6.98; P < 0.001) NSS. While the PSM rate decreased from 51% to 42% in patients with pT3 stage disease (P = 0.031), NeuroSAFE was not an independent predictor of PSM status (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.68–1.06; P = 0.2) in the entire cohort. Patients who underwent NeuroSAFE had better BCRFS compared to the control cohort (hazard ratio 0.62, 95% CI 0.45–0.84; P = 0.002). This study is limited by its comparison with a historical cohort and lack of functional outcomes. Conclusions: NeuroSAFE enables more unilateral and bilateral NSS without negatively affecting surgical margin status and biochemical recurrence. This validation study provides a comprehensive overview of the implementation, evaluation and intra-operative decision making associated with NeuroSAFE in clinical practice.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)628-636
Number of pages9
JournalBJU International
Volume130
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2022

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
The study was sponsored by a generous grant from the BeterKeten foundation. Open access funding enabled and organized by ProjektDEAL.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors. BJU International published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of BJU International.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'NeuroSAFE in radical prostatectomy increases the rate of nerve-sparing surgery without affecting oncological outcome'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this