Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Non‐trade in the MENA revisited: A Gravity Model Analysis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

3 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This paper provides a historical perspective on comparatively low levels of trade in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region, focusing on studies addressing the impact of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict. Our literature review identifies best practices and reviews trade potential estimates and finds that the last year for which a relevant trade potential estimate for the region accounting for the influence of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict is available is 1999. First, we replicate the seminal study that provided the earliest estimation of trade potential. Next, we extend and update this study, using a best practice panel PPML gravity model with ex(/im)porter-year fixed effects for 76 countries (1991–2019 inclusive). Finally, we use two alternative approaches to estimate the intra-MENA trade potential that could have been reaped as a consequence of a geopolitically more stable and open Middle East (ME). In the year 2019, this ‘pot of gold’ (POG) in per cent of intra-MENA trade amounted to 10% to 54% (import-based) and 21% to 48% (export-based), substantially lower than earlier literature reports.
Original languageEnglish
Article number121
JournalEconomies
Volume14
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 7 Apr 2026

Bibliographical note

JEL: F5, F14, N74, O19

The project papers were presented at The European Neighborhood Policy Summer School (June 2016), the 17th Development Dialogue (July 2021) and the European Trade Study Group’s 23rd annual conference, Groningen (September 2022)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Non‐trade in the MENA revisited: A Gravity Model Analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this