TY - JOUR
T1 - Novel approach to monitor intravenous immunoglobulin pharmacokinetics in humans using polymorphic determinants in IgG1 constant domains
AU - van Tilburg, S. J.
AU - Jacobs, B. C.
AU - Ooijevaar-de Heer, P.
AU - Fokkink, W. J. R.
AU - Huizinga, R.
AU - Vidarsson, G.
AU - Rispens, T.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the Prinses Beatrix Spierfonds (W.OR19‐24).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Wiley-VCH GmbH.
PY - 2022/4
Y1 - 2022/4
N2 - Clinical efficacy of intravenous immunoglobulin treatment (IVIg) is related to its pharmacokinetic (PK) profile. Its usual evaluation, by measuring serum total IgG levels, is imprecise, because IVIg cannot be distinguished from endogenous IgG. We developed ELISAs to specifically monitor the PK of IVIg using the polymorphic determinants G1m(a), G1m(x), and G1m(f). The specificity of the IgG1 allotype assays was sufficient to determine IVIg concentrations as low as 0.1 mg/mL in sera from individuals not expressing the respective markers. IVIg was quantified in posttreatment serum from patients with Guillain–Barré syndrome (GBS) by measuring IgG1 allotypes not expressed endogenously. After serotyping, 27/28 GBS patients were found eligible for IVIg monitoring using one or two genetic markers. In 17 cases, IVIg levels could be determined by both anti-G1m(a) and anti-G1m(x) measurement, showing significant correlation. Longitudinal monitoring of IVIg PK in seven GBS patients showed potential differences in clearance of total IgG versus IVIg-derived IgG, highlighting that total IgG measurements may not accurately reflect IVIg PK. To summarize, anti-IgG1 allotype assays can discriminate between endogenous IgG and therapeutic polyclonal IgG. These assays will be an important tool to better understand the variability in IVIg PK and treatment response of all patients treated with IVIg.
AB - Clinical efficacy of intravenous immunoglobulin treatment (IVIg) is related to its pharmacokinetic (PK) profile. Its usual evaluation, by measuring serum total IgG levels, is imprecise, because IVIg cannot be distinguished from endogenous IgG. We developed ELISAs to specifically monitor the PK of IVIg using the polymorphic determinants G1m(a), G1m(x), and G1m(f). The specificity of the IgG1 allotype assays was sufficient to determine IVIg concentrations as low as 0.1 mg/mL in sera from individuals not expressing the respective markers. IVIg was quantified in posttreatment serum from patients with Guillain–Barré syndrome (GBS) by measuring IgG1 allotypes not expressed endogenously. After serotyping, 27/28 GBS patients were found eligible for IVIg monitoring using one or two genetic markers. In 17 cases, IVIg levels could be determined by both anti-G1m(a) and anti-G1m(x) measurement, showing significant correlation. Longitudinal monitoring of IVIg PK in seven GBS patients showed potential differences in clearance of total IgG versus IVIg-derived IgG, highlighting that total IgG measurements may not accurately reflect IVIg PK. To summarize, anti-IgG1 allotype assays can discriminate between endogenous IgG and therapeutic polyclonal IgG. These assays will be an important tool to better understand the variability in IVIg PK and treatment response of all patients treated with IVIg.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85121592197&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/eji.202149653
DO - 10.1002/eji.202149653
M3 - Article
C2 - 34854474
SN - 0014-2980
VL - 52
SP - 609
EP - 617
JO - European Journal of Immunology
JF - European Journal of Immunology
IS - 4
ER -