Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Omission of Contralateral Systematic Biopsies in Unilateral Suspicious Prostate Cancer on Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Implications for Radiation Treatment Selection

  • Daniël L. van den Kroonenberg*
  • , Sanne J. Jonker
  • , Auke Jager
  • , Joëlle D. Stoter
  • , Eva Schaake
  • , Karel A. Hinnen
  • , Wietse S.C. Eppinga
  • , Ivo G. Schoots
  • , Jochem R.N. van der Voort van Zyp
  • , André N. Vis
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • VU University Medical Center
  • Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital
  • Amsterdam UMC
  • Utrecht University
  • The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital
  • Prostate Cancer Network

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)
22 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background and objective: A combined approach of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) targeted biopsies (TBx) and systematic biopsies (SBx) was recommended previously in patients with unilateral suspicious prostate cancer (PCa) on MRI. Yet, new PCa guidelines suggest that contralateral SBx can be omitted. It is unknown how this guideline modification impacts treatment selection. This study evaluates the value of contralateral SBx in radiation treatment selection in patients with unilateral suspicious lesions (Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System [PI-RADS] ≥3) on MRI. Methods: Case files of 80 patients with a unilateral suspicious lesion on diagnostic MRI who underwent TBx and bilateral SBx were collected. The cases were presented to four radiation oncologists twice: once with diagnostic information of bilateral SBx and TBx, and once with diagnostic information of ipsilateral SBx and TBx pathology results. Based on this information, external beam radiation treatment (EBRT) fractionation scheme, duration of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), and feasibility of brachytherapy (monotherapy or brachyboost) were considered. Key findings and limitations: After omitting information of contralateral SBx pathology results, selection of EBRT fractionation scheme and ADT duration changed in 14% (95% confidence interval [CI] 9.8–17) and 15% (95% CI 11–19) of cases, respectively. The feasibility of brachytherapy as monotherapy and brachyboost, respectively, changed in 11% (95% CI 7.9–15) and in 21% (95% CI 17–26) of cases, with overall poor interobserver variability for both diagnostic scenarios (Fleiss’ kappa 0.15 and 0.16). Conclusions and clinical implications: Our findings indicate that omitting contralateral SBx has an impact on the treatment selection of patients who choose for radiation therapy as their treatment for locally confined PCa. 

Patient summary: In patients with prostate cancer identified via magnetic resonance imaging on one side of the prostate, exclusion of prostate biopsies from the opposite side affected the selection of radiation treatment.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)17-23
Number of pages7
JournalEuropean Urology Open Science
Volume73
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright: © 2025 The Author(s)

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Omission of Contralateral Systematic Biopsies in Unilateral Suspicious Prostate Cancer on Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Implications for Radiation Treatment Selection'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this