Abstract
This article focuses on social situations in which people are surprised about what is happening and
inhibited about how to respond to the situation at hand. We study these situations by examining a classic
topic in social psychology: how people respond to receiving better outcomes than are deserved. In these
situations, the actions of an authority or a coworker push in the direction of accepting and enjoying the
unfair outcome, whereas personal values for most people push in the direction of rejecting or being
displeased with the outcome. This conflict may inhibit people¿s response to the advantageous but unfair
outcomes. If people are indeed inhibited about how to respond to these kinds of outcomes, then lowering
behavioral inhibition by reminding people of having acted in the past without inhibitions (in a manner
that is unrelated to the outcomes participants subsequently receive) should affect reactions to the
outcomes. Specifically, we hypothesize that because many people are prosocial and want to adhere to
principles of fairness, reminders of behavioral disinhibition will lead to less pleasure with the unfairly
obtained outcomes. The results of 8 experiments (conducted both inside and outside the psychology
laboratory) revealed evidence for this benign disinhibition effect on various reactions to outcomes that
are better than deserved. In further accordance with our line of reasoning, the effect is particularly
pronounced among those who adhere to a prosocial orientation or who have adopted a prosocial mindset
and is not observed among those with proself orientations or mindsets.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 791-811 |
Number of pages | 21 |
Journal | Journal of Personality and Social Psychology |
Volume | 101 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 21 Sept 2011 |