TY - JOUR
T1 - On the production of interlingual homophones
T2 - Delayed naming and increased N400
AU - Christoffels, Ingrid
AU - Timmer, Kalinka
AU - Ganushchak, Lesya
AU - La Heij, Wido
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2016/5/27
Y1 - 2016/5/27
N2 - ABSTRACT: Bilinguals take longer to identify interlingual homophones than control words. For example, Dutch–English bilinguals take longer to identify an English word like “leaf” ([li:f]), a homophone of the Dutch word “lief” ([lif]; meaning “sweet”), than to identify a control word like “branch”. This homophone-delay effect, observed with both visual and auditory presentation, has been interpreted as evidence in favour of language non-selective lexical access. The present article examines whether a homophone effect is also present in word production. Theoretically, homophone production may profit from feedback from a phonemic level back to a lexical level, but may suffer from a semantic conflict during a process of output monitoring. In line with the latter view, the results show (a) a delay in the production of homophones in the second language, (b) an increased error percentage in the production of homophones in both the first and second language, (c) a reduction in P200 amplitude in the production of homophones in the second language and (d) an increase in the N400 in the production of homophones in both languages of the bilingual.
AB - ABSTRACT: Bilinguals take longer to identify interlingual homophones than control words. For example, Dutch–English bilinguals take longer to identify an English word like “leaf” ([li:f]), a homophone of the Dutch word “lief” ([lif]; meaning “sweet”), than to identify a control word like “branch”. This homophone-delay effect, observed with both visual and auditory presentation, has been interpreted as evidence in favour of language non-selective lexical access. The present article examines whether a homophone effect is also present in word production. Theoretically, homophone production may profit from feedback from a phonemic level back to a lexical level, but may suffer from a semantic conflict during a process of output monitoring. In line with the latter view, the results show (a) a delay in the production of homophones in the second language, (b) an increased error percentage in the production of homophones in both the first and second language, (c) a reduction in P200 amplitude in the production of homophones in the second language and (d) an increase in the N400 in the production of homophones in both languages of the bilingual.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84951274048&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/23273798.2015.1120877
DO - 10.1080/23273798.2015.1120877
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84951274048
SN - 2327-3798
VL - 31
SP - 628
EP - 638
JO - Language, Cognition and Neuroscience
JF - Language, Cognition and Neuroscience
IS - 5
ER -