On the Psychology of Financial Compensations to Restore Fairness Transgressions: When Intentions Determine Value

Pieter Desmet, D (David) De Cremer, E van Dijk

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

An important challenge for actors in economic exchange relations concerns dealing with the aftermath of unethical behavior and the violation of trust that such transgressions entail. As transgressions in these relations often result in financial harm for one party, a common restorative approach consists of the transgressor paying a financial compensation to the victim; either voluntarily, or following coercion by a third party (cf. litigation). In the present article, we studied the impact of financial compensations on victims¿ trust towards the transgressor and examined whether the size of the compensation is relevant to this process. In contrast to outcome- based models in game theory, we predicted that whether larger compensations foster more trust, depends on whether the compensation is provided voluntarily or not. Experimental data from a trust game supported our hypothesis by showing that larger compensations only lead to more trust when the transgressor provided the compensation voluntarily, whereas compensation size had no effect when the transgressor was forced by a third party.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)105-115
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Business Ethics
Volume95
Issue numbersupplement 1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'On the Psychology of Financial Compensations to Restore Fairness Transgressions: When Intentions Determine Value'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this