Optimal Left Ventricular Lead Position Predicts Reverse Remodeling and Survival After Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

  • C Ypenburg
  • , Rutger Bommel
  • , V Delgado
  • , SA Mollema
  • , GB Bleeker
  • , Eric Boersma
  • , MJ Schalij
  • , JJ Bax

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

348 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives The aim of the current study was to evaluate echocardiographic parameters after 6 months of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) as well as long-term outcome in patients with the left ventricular (LV) lead positioned at the site of latest activation (concordant LV lead position) as compared with that seen in patients with a discordant LV lead position. Background A nonoptimal LV pacing lead position may be a potential cause for nonresponse to CRT. Methods The site of latest mechanical activation was determined by speckle tracking radial strain analysis and related to the LV lead position on chest X-ray in 244 CRT candidates. Echocardiographic evaluation was performed after 6 months. Long-term follow-up included all-cause mortality and hospitalizations for heart failure. Results Significant LV reverse remodeling (reduction in LV end-systolic volume from 189 +/- 83 ml to 134 +/- 71 ml, p < 0.001) was noted in the group of patients with a concordant LV lead position (n = 153, 63%), whereas patients with a discordant lead position showed no significant improvements. In addition, during long-term follow-up (32 +/- 16 months), less events (combined for heart failure hospitalizations and death) were reported in patients with a concordant LV lead position. Moreover, a concordant LV lead position appeared to be an independent predictor of hospitalization-free survival after long-term CRT (hazard ratio: 0.22, p = 0.004). Conclusions Pacing at the site of latest mechanical activation, as determined by speckle tracking radial strain analysis, resulted in superior echocardiographic response after 6 months of CRT and better prognosis during long-term follow-up. (J Am Coll Cardiol 2008; 52: 1402 -9) (C) 2008 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
Original languageUndefined/Unknown
Pages (from-to)1402-1409
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of the American College of Cardiology
Volume52
Issue number17
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008

Cite this