Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Optimizing COPD Care in Belgium: A Multidisciplinary Expert Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Risk Management

  • Naomi Michotte*
  • , Fabian Demeure
  • , Julien Guiot
  • , Sander Trenson
  • , Michiel J.E.G.W. Vanfleteren
  • , Lies Lahousse
  • , Jo Raskin
  • , Didier Cataldo
  • , Thérèse Lapperre
  • , Eric Marchand
  • , Mathias Leys
  • , Wim Janssens
  • , Marie Bruyneel
  • , Lowie E.G.W. Vanfleteren
  • , Eef Vanderhelst
  • , Pieter Goeminne
  • , Stefan Teughels
  • , Muriel Lins
  • , Inès Van Rossem
  • , Rudi Peché
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Vrije Universiteit Brussel
  • Université catholique de Louvain
  • University of Liege
  • AZ St-Jan Bruges-Ostend AV Hospital
  • Sint-Josefskliniek
  • Ghent University
  • Antwerp University Hospital
  • University of Antwerp
  • Universite de Namur
  • AZ Groeninge
  • University Hospitals Leuven
  • Saint-Pierre University Hospital
  • Brugmann University Hospital
  • Ghent University Hospital
  • VITAZ
  • Domus Medica
  • AZ St Maarten
  • CHU de Charleroi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

3 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Introduction: 

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) represents a major health and economic challenge in Belgium, affecting approximately 800,000 individuals, half of whom remain undiagnosed. Beyond respiratory morbidity, COPD patients face substantial cardiopulmonary (CP) risk—encompassing severe exacerbations and cardiovascular (CV) events—that is often under-recognized and insufficiently addressed due to limited clinical awareness, fragmented care, and the absence of national guidance.

Methods: 

A multidisciplinary Belgian taskforce (general practitioners, pulmonologists, cardiologists, pharmacists, epidemiologists) convened through structured workshops and iterative consensus-building to develop a pragmatic, evidence-informed care pathway. The recommendations focus on COPD patients with at least one moderate or severe exacerbation, who are at heightened CP risk. 

Results: 

This consensus introduces an integrated, stepwise framework that positions CP risk as a central component of COPD management after exacerbation and operationalizes it across primary care, hospitalization, and post-exacerbation follow-up. Core elements include systematic and proactive CP risk identification in primary care, standardized diagnostic workups during hospitalization, and multidisciplinary discharge planning. Pharmacological strategies combine eosinophil-guided inhaler therapy with guideline-directed CV treatment, while non-pharmacological measures reinforce smoking cessation, vaccination, physical activity, and pulmonary rehabilitation. Clear referral thresholds between primary care, pulmonology, and cardiology are defined, supported by patient education and digital monitoring tools. 

Conclusion: 

This Belgian consensus complements international guidelines by consolidating fragmented recommendations into coherent, actionable algorithms that bridge gaps in routine practice. Its contribution lies in translating emerging evidence into structured, real-world pathways that integrate respiratory and cardiac care. Adoption of this framework may help reduce exacerbations, improve CV outcomes, and support multidisciplinary COPD care in Belgium.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-20
Number of pages20
JournalInternational Journal of COPD
Volume21
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 13 Jan 2026

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2026 Michotte et al.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Optimizing COPD Care in Belgium: A Multidisciplinary Expert Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Risk Management'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this