TY - JOUR
T1 - Optimizing cytological specimens of EUS-FNA of solid pancreatic lesions: A pilot study to the effect of a smear preparation training for endoscopy personnel on sample quality and accuracy
AU - van Riet, Priscilla
AU - Quispel, R
AU - Cahen, Djuna
AU - Erler, Nicole
AU - Snijders - Kruisbergen, Mieke
AU - van Loenen, Petri
AU - Poley, Jan-werner
AU - Driel, LMJW
AU - Mulder, SA
AU - Veldt, BJ
AU - Leeuwenburgh, I
AU - Anten, MP
AU - Honkoop, P
AU - Thijssen, AY
AU - Hol, Lieke
AU - Hadithi, M
AU - Fitzpatrick, CE
AU - Schot, I
AU - Bergmann, JF
AU - Bhalla, A
AU - Bruno, Marco
AU - Biermann, Katharina
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Authors. Diagnostic Cytopathology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
PY - 2021/2
Y1 - 2021/2
N2 - Background: In the absence of rapid on-side pathological evaluation, endoscopy staff generally “smears” endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) specimens on a glass slide. As this technique is vulnerable to preparation artifacts, we assessed if its quality could be improved through a smear-preparation-training for endoscopy staff. Methods: In this prospective pilot study, 10 endosonographers and 12 endoscopy nurses from seven regional EUS-centers in the Netherlands were invited to participate in a EUS-FNA smear-preparation-training. Subsequently, post training slides derived from solid pancreatic lesions were compared to pre-training “control” slides. Primary outcome was to assess if the training positively affects smear quality and, consequently, diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNA of solid pancreatic lesions. Results: Participants collected and prepared 71 cases, mostly pancreatic head lesions (48%). Sixty-eight controls were selected from the pretraining period. The presence of artifacts was comparable for smears performed before and after training (76% vs 82%, P =.36). Likewise, smear cellularity (≥50% target cells) before and after training did not differ (44% (30/68) vs 49% (35/71), P =.48). Similar, no difference in diagnostic accuracy for malignancy was detected (P =.10). Conclusion: In this pilot EUS-FNA smear-preparation-training for endoscopy personnel, smear quality and diagnostic accuracy were not improved after the training. Based on these results, we plan to further study other training programs and possibilities.
AB - Background: In the absence of rapid on-side pathological evaluation, endoscopy staff generally “smears” endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) specimens on a glass slide. As this technique is vulnerable to preparation artifacts, we assessed if its quality could be improved through a smear-preparation-training for endoscopy staff. Methods: In this prospective pilot study, 10 endosonographers and 12 endoscopy nurses from seven regional EUS-centers in the Netherlands were invited to participate in a EUS-FNA smear-preparation-training. Subsequently, post training slides derived from solid pancreatic lesions were compared to pre-training “control” slides. Primary outcome was to assess if the training positively affects smear quality and, consequently, diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNA of solid pancreatic lesions. Results: Participants collected and prepared 71 cases, mostly pancreatic head lesions (48%). Sixty-eight controls were selected from the pretraining period. The presence of artifacts was comparable for smears performed before and after training (76% vs 82%, P =.36). Likewise, smear cellularity (≥50% target cells) before and after training did not differ (44% (30/68) vs 49% (35/71), P =.48). Similar, no difference in diagnostic accuracy for malignancy was detected (P =.10). Conclusion: In this pilot EUS-FNA smear-preparation-training for endoscopy personnel, smear quality and diagnostic accuracy were not improved after the training. Based on these results, we plan to further study other training programs and possibilities.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85093520106&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/dc.24645
DO - 10.1002/dc.24645
M3 - Article
SN - 8755-1039
VL - 49
SP - 295
EP - 302
JO - Diagnostic Cytopathology
JF - Diagnostic Cytopathology
IS - 2
ER -