Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Optimizing quality of cancer care using outcome information

Research output: Types of ThesisDoctoral ThesisInternal

46 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This thesis focuses on the central role of healthcare outcomes in optimizing the quality of
cancer care. The overall aim is to advance both the understanding and the practical
application of outcome-based quality assessment in oncology. Part I explores how outcome information can be used for valid and reliable hospital comparisons, thereby stimulating continuous quality improvement, while Part II examines how outcome predictions can support personalised care and improve shared decision-making. Together, these approaches are essential for achieving outcome-driven, value-based cancer care.

In Chapter 2, we review the current landscape of cancer outcome benchmarking in Europe, focusing on quality indicators and the methodology of case-mix adjustment models. In Chapter 3, we develop a case-mix adjustment model for an important outcome indicator in the NBCA: complications after surgery. Since case-mix adjustment alone does not ensure the validity and reliability of an indicator, we introduce a structured framework to evaluate quality indicators based on feasibility, discriminative ability, validity, and reliability (Chapter 4), and apply it to both breast cancer (a high-incidence cancer) and oral cavity cancer (a low-incidence cancer; Chapter 5).

In Chapter 6, we externally validate the updated PREDICT tool (version 3.1) for supporting clinical decision-making in Dutch and Swedish breast cancer patients, with a focus on lobular breast cancer and younger patients, two groups for whom outcomes are harder to predict and more uncertain. In Chapter 7, we compare version 3.1 of the PREDICT tool with the previous version (2.2), using data from the Dutch population and 36 clinically relevant subgroups. Finally, in Chapter 8, we develop models to predict trends in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) after breast cancer surgery and reconstruction, using 15 different HRQoL outcomes, aiming to better support patients and clinicians in managing expectations during SDM.
Original languageEnglish
Awarding Institution
  • Erasmus University Rotterdam
Supervisors/Advisors
  • Lingsma, Hester, Supervisor
  • Siesling, Sabine S., Supervisor, External person
  • Koppert, Linetta, Supervisor
  • van Klaveren, David, Co-supervisor
Award date23 Jun 2026
Place of PublicationRotterdam
Print ISBNs978-94-6534-370-9
Publication statusPublished - 23 Jun 2026

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Optimizing quality of cancer care using outcome information'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this