Abstract
We discuss options to reform the EU genetically modified organism (GMO) regulatory framework, make risk assessment and decision-making more consistent with scientific principles, and lay the groundwork for international coherence. In this third of three articles, we focus on labeling and coexistence as well as discuss the political reality and potential ways forward.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 465-467 |
Number of pages | 3 |
Journal | Trends in Biotechnology |
Volume | 38 |
Issue number | 5 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 12 Feb 2020 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:This work was supported by the Swedish Foundation for Strategic Environmental Research (Mistra) through the Mistra Biotech research program and the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research through the project ?Ethical, Legal and Socio-economic Aspects of Genome Editing in Agriculture? (grant reference number: 01GP1613C).
Funding Information:
This work was supported by the Swedish Foundation for Strategic Environmental Research (Mistra) through the Mistra Biotech research program and the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research through the project ‘Ethical, Legal and Socio-economic Aspects of Genome Editing in Agriculture’ (grant reference number: 01GP1613C).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Elsevier Ltd