Options to Reform the European Union Legislation on GMOs: Post-authorization and Beyond

Dennis Eriksson; René Custers; Karin Edvardsson Björnberg; Sven Ove Hansson; Kai Purnhagen; Matin Qaim; Jörg Romeis; Joachim Schiemann; Stephan Schleissing; Jale Tosun; Richard G.F. Visser

doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2019.12.015

Options to Reform the European Union Legislation on GMOs: Post-authorization and Beyond

Dennis Eriksson^*, René Custers, Karin Edvardsson Björnberg, Sven Ove Hansson, Kai Purnhagen, Matin Qaim, Jörg Romeis, Joachim Schiemann, Stephan Schleissing, Jale Tosun, Richard G.F. Visser

^*Corresponding author for this work

Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Research output: Contribution to journal › Short survey › Academic › peer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We discuss options to reform the EU genetically modified organism (GMO) regulatory framework, make risk assessment and decision-making more consistent with scientific principles, and lay the groundwork for international coherence. In this third of three articles, we focus on labeling and coexistence as well as discuss the political reality and potential ways forward.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	465-467
Number of pages	3
Journal	Trends in Biotechnology
Volume	38
Issue number	5
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2019.12.015
Publication status	Published - 12 Feb 2020

Access to Document

10.1016/j.tibtech.2019.12.015

Cite this

@article{bf82889df18645baa419a22814b4b523,

title = "Options to Reform the European Union Legislation on GMOs: Post-authorization and Beyond",

abstract = "We discuss options to reform the EU genetically modified organism (GMO) regulatory framework, make risk assessment and decision-making more consistent with scientific principles, and lay the groundwork for international coherence. In this third of three articles, we focus on labeling and coexistence as well as discuss the political reality and potential ways forward.",

author = "Dennis Eriksson and Ren{\'e} Custers and {Edvardsson Bj{\"o}rnberg}, Karin and Hansson, {Sven Ove} and Kai Purnhagen and Matin Qaim and J{\"o}rg Romeis and Joachim Schiemann and Stephan Schleissing and Jale Tosun and Visser, {Richard G.F.}",

note = "Funding Information: This work was supported by the Swedish Foundation for Strategic Environmental Research (Mistra) through the Mistra Biotech research program and the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research through the project ?Ethical, Legal and Socio-economic Aspects of Genome Editing in Agriculture? (grant reference number: 01GP1613C). Funding Information: This work was supported by the Swedish Foundation for Strategic Environmental Research (Mistra) through the Mistra Biotech research program and the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research through the project {\textquoteleft}Ethical, Legal and Socio-economic Aspects of Genome Editing in Agriculture{\textquoteright} (grant reference number: 01GP1613C). Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2020 Elsevier Ltd",

year = "2020",

month = feb,

day = "12",

doi = "10.1016/j.tibtech.2019.12.015",

language = "English",

volume = "38",

pages = "465--467",

journal = "Trends in Biotechnology",

issn = "0167-7799",

publisher = "Elsevier Ltd.",

number = "5",

}

Options to Reform the European Union Legislation on GMOs : Post-authorization and Beyond. / Eriksson, Dennis; Custers, René; Edvardsson Björnberg, Karin; Hansson, Sven Ove; Purnhagen, Kai; Qaim, Matin; Romeis, Jörg; Schiemann, Joachim; Schleissing, Stephan; Tosun, Jale; Visser, Richard G.F.

In: Trends in Biotechnology, Vol. 38, No. 5, 12.02.2020, p. 465-467.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Short survey › Academic › peer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Options to Reform the European Union Legislation on GMOs

T2 - Post-authorization and Beyond

AU - Eriksson, Dennis

AU - Custers, René

AU - Edvardsson Björnberg, Karin

AU - Hansson, Sven Ove

AU - Purnhagen, Kai

AU - Qaim, Matin

AU - Romeis, Jörg

AU - Schiemann, Joachim

AU - Schleissing, Stephan

AU - Tosun, Jale

AU - Visser, Richard G.F.

N1 - Funding Information: This work was supported by the Swedish Foundation for Strategic Environmental Research (Mistra) through the Mistra Biotech research program and the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research through the project ?Ethical, Legal and Socio-economic Aspects of Genome Editing in Agriculture? (grant reference number: 01GP1613C). Funding Information: This work was supported by the Swedish Foundation for Strategic Environmental Research (Mistra) through the Mistra Biotech research program and the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research through the project ‘Ethical, Legal and Socio-economic Aspects of Genome Editing in Agriculture’ (grant reference number: 01GP1613C). Publisher Copyright: © 2020 Elsevier Ltd

PY - 2020/2/12

Y1 - 2020/2/12

N2 - We discuss options to reform the EU genetically modified organism (GMO) regulatory framework, make risk assessment and decision-making more consistent with scientific principles, and lay the groundwork for international coherence. In this third of three articles, we focus on labeling and coexistence as well as discuss the political reality and potential ways forward.

AB - We discuss options to reform the EU genetically modified organism (GMO) regulatory framework, make risk assessment and decision-making more consistent with scientific principles, and lay the groundwork for international coherence. In this third of three articles, we focus on labeling and coexistence as well as discuss the political reality and potential ways forward.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85083246093&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.tibtech.2019.12.015

DO - 10.1016/j.tibtech.2019.12.015

M3 - Short survey

C2 - 32302577

AN - SCOPUS:85083246093

VL - 38

SP - 465

EP - 467

JO - Trends in Biotechnology

JF - Trends in Biotechnology

SN - 0167-7799

IS - 5

ER -

Options to Reform the European Union Legislation on GMOs: Post-authorization and Beyond

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this