Abstract
We discuss options to reform the EU genetically modified organisms (GMO) regulatory framework, make risk assessment and decision-making more consistent with scientific principles, and lay the groundwork for international coherence. The first in a three-part series, this article focuses on reform options related to the scope of the legislation and the GMO definition.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 231-234 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| Journal | Trends in Biotechnology |
| Volume | 38 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Mar 2020 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:This work was supported by the Swedish Foundation for Strategic Environmental Research (Mistra) through the Mistra Biotech research programme; and the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research through the project ?Ethical, Legal and Socioeconomic Aspects of Genome Editing in Agriculture? (grant reference number: 01GP1613C).
Funding Information:
This work was supported by the Swedish Foundation for Strategic Environmental Research (Mistra) through the Mistra Biotech research programme; and the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research through the project ‘Ethical, Legal and Socioeconomic Aspects of Genome Editing in Agriculture’ (grant reference number: 01GP1613C).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Authors
Research programs
- ESL – Diversen Oud