Outcomes of limited fasciectomy, needle fasciotomy and collagenase injection for Dupuytren's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data

Bente A. van den Berge*, Hosniya Habibi, Pieter U. Dijkstra, Isam Atroshi, Tim R. C. Davis, Per Jenmalm, Annet van Rijssen, Ruud W. Selles, Peter Scherman, Joakim Stroemberg, Simon T. Skov, Esther Vogelin, Paul M. N. Werker, Dieuwke C. Broekstra

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

6 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data evaluates the outcomes of treatment for Dupuytren's disease using limited fasciectomy (LF), percutaneous needle fasciotomy (PNF) and collagenase clostridium histolyticum (CCH) injection. A total of 1423 studies were identified, of which 15 met the eligibility criteria for meta-analysis. The postoperative total extension deficit was smaller after LF than after PNF or CCH, but the difference was not clinically relevant. Minor complications were more frequent after CCH than after LF and PNF. The risk of major complications did not differ between the treatments. Recurrence occurred earlier after PNF and CCH than after LF during 36 months of follow-up. Patient-reported outcome measures showed substantial heterogeneity, which precluded meta-analysis. Overall, the clinically relevant contracture correction was comparable between LF, PNF and CCH, but CCH had a higher risk of minor complications and LF had the longest time to recurrence. Treatment decisions should consider the trade-off between complications and recurrence risk.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)878-890
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Hand Surgery-European Volume
Volume50
Issue number7
Early online date20 May 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2025.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Outcomes of limited fasciectomy, needle fasciotomy and collagenase injection for Dupuytren's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this