Outcomes of Systemic Treatment in Children and Adults With Netherton Syndrome: A Systematic Review

Anouk E.M. Nouwen, Renske Schappin, N. Tan Nguyen, Aviël Ragamin, Anette Bygum, Christine Bodemer, Virgil A.S.H. Dalm, Suzanne G.M.A. Pasmans*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)
41 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Comèl-Netherton syndrome (NS) is a rare disease caused by pathogenic variants in the SPINK5 gene, leading to severe skin barrier impairment and proinflammatory upregulation. Given the severity of the disease, treatment of NS is challenging. Current treatment regimens are mainly topical and supportive. Although novel systemic treatment options for NS have been suggested in recent literature, little is known about their outcomes. Objective: to provide an overview of systemic treatment options and their outcomes in adults and children with NS. Methods: Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Google Scholar were searched up to July 22, 2021. Empirical studies published in English language mentioning systemic treatment in NS were enrolled. Studies that did not define a treatment period or report at least one outcome were excluded. Methodological quality was evaluated by the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklist for case reports or case series. Overall quality of evidence of the primary outcome, skin, was assessed by the GRADE approach. Results: 36 case series and case reports were included. The effects of 15 systemic therapies were described in 48 patients, of which 27 were children. Therapies included retinoids, prednisolone, cyclosporine, immunoglobulins, and biologicals. In retinoids both worsening (4/15 cases) and improvement (6/15 cases) of the skin was observed. Use of prednisolone and cyclosporine was only reported in one patient. Immunoglobulins (13/15 cases) and biologicals (18/21 cases) showed improvement of the skin. Certainty of evidence was rated as very low. Conclusion: NS is a rare disease, which is reflected in the scarce literature on systemic treatment outcomes in children and adults with NS. Studies showed large heterogeneity in outcome measures. Adverse events were scarcely reported. Long-term outcomes were reported in a minority of cases. Nonetheless, a general beneficial effect of systemic treatment was found. Immunoglobulins and biologicals showed the most promising results and should be further explored. Future research should focus on determining a core outcome set and measurement instruments for NS to improve quality of research. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=217933, PROSPERO (ID: 217933).

Original languageEnglish
Article number864449
JournalFrontiers in Immunology
Volume13
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Mar 2022

Bibliographical note

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS:
This study is part of the ERN-SKIN-subthematic group Ichthyosis (https://ern-skin.eu), The International Netherton Network (https://nethertonnetwork.com/thinc-2021), The Center of Rare Diseases Erasmus MC, and the Center of Rare Skin Diseases-Netherton Expert Center Erasmus MC, acknowledged by the Dutch Ministry of Health. We thank Kira Stuvel and Karin Veldman for their contributions to the Netherton projects. We thank all authors of the Netherton studies for their work and effort to improve knowledge and care in patients with Netherton syndrome. We thank Sabrina Gunput, Maarten Engel, and Wichor Bramer of the Erasmus MC Medical Library for their contribution to the search strategy.

Publisher Copyright: Copyright © 2022 Nouwen, Schappin, Nguyen, Ragamin, Bygum, Bodemer, Dalm and Pasmans.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Outcomes of Systemic Treatment in Children and Adults With Netherton Syndrome: A Systematic Review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this