Abstract
When a technology is seen as the right solution to a recognized problem, the development of alternative technologies comes under threat. To secure much-needed resources, proponents of alternative technologies must, in these conditions, restart societal discussion on the status quo, a process at once technological and discursive known as ‘path creation’. In this article, we investigate discussion-restarting strategies employed by supporters of emerging technologies in the field of solar fuels, particularly the advocates of a technology referred to as ‘artificial photosynthesis’. For illustrative purposes we explore four such strategies: revisiting weak spots, resizing the problem, redefining the game, and renegotiating labels. We conclude with a methodological reflection on the empirical study of discursive strategies in a socio-technical system. We further suggest a more systematic application of discourse-analytical and argumentation-theoretical insights that can complement current scholarship on path dependence and path creation.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 62-84 |
| Number of pages | 23 |
| Journal | Social Studies of Science |
| Volume | 55 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Feb 2025 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© The Author(s) 2024.
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Path creation as a discursive process: A study of discussion starters in the field of solar fuels'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver