Patiromer Facilitates Angiotensin Inhibitor and Mineralocorticoid Antagonist Therapies in Patients With Heart Failure and Hyperkalemia

  • Bertram Pitt*
  • , Stefan D. Anker
  • , Lars H. Lund
  • , Andrew J.S. Coats
  • , Gerasimos Filippatos
  • , Patrick Rossignol
  • , Matthew R. Weir
  • , Tim Friede
  • , Mikhail N. Kosiborod
  • , Marco Metra
  • , Michael Böhm
  • , Justin A. Ezekowitz
  • , Antoni Bayes-Genis
  • , Robert J. Mentz
  • , Piotr Ponikowski
  • , Michele Senni
  • , Ileana L. Piña
  • , Fausto J. Pinto
  • , Peter van der Meer
  • , Cecilia Bahit
  • Jan Belohlavek, Jasper J. Brugts, Amandine Perrin, Sandra Waechter, Jeffrey Budden, Javed Butler
*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)
17 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: 

Hyperkalemia (HK) is associated with suboptimal renin–angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitor and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) use in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). 

Objectives: 

This study sought to assess characteristics and RAS inhibitor/MRA use in patients receiving patiromer during the DIAMOND (Patiromer for the Management of Hyperkalemia in Subjects Receiving RAASi Medications for the Treatment of Heart Failure) run-in phase. 

Methods: 

Patients with HFrEF and HK or past HK entered a run-in phase of ≤12 weeks with patiromer-facilitated RAS inhibitor/MRA optimization to achieve ≥50% recommended RAS inhibitor dose, 50 mg/d MRA, and normokalemia. Patients achieving these criteria (randomized group) were compared with the run-in failure group (patients not meeting the randomization criteria). 

Results: 

Of 1,038 patients completing the run-in, 878 (84.6%) were randomized and 160 (15.4%) were run-in failures. Overall, 422 (40.7%) had HK entering run-in with a similar frequency in the randomized and run-in failure groups (40.3% vs 42.5%; P = 0.605). From start to the end of run-in, in the randomized group, an increase was observed in target RAS inhibitor and MRA use in patients with HK (RAS inhibitor: 76.8% to 98.6%; MRA: 35.9% to 98.6%) and past HK (RAS inhibitor: 60.5% to 98.1%; MRA: 15.6% to 98.7%). Despite not meeting the randomization criteria, an increase after run-in was observed in the run-in failure group in target RAS inhibitor (52.5% to 70.6%) and MRA use (15.0% to 48.1%). This increase was observed in patients with HK (RAS inhibitor: 51.5% to 64.7%; MRA: 19.1% to 39.7%) and past HK (RAS inhibitor: 53.3% to 75.0%; MRA: 12.0% to 54.3%). 

Conclusions: 

In patients with HFrEF and HK or past HK receiving suboptimal RAS inhibitor/MRA therapy, RAS inhibitor/MRA optimization increased during patiromer-facilitated run-in.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1295-1308
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of the American College of Cardiology
Volume84
Issue number14
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Authors

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Patiromer Facilitates Angiotensin Inhibitor and Mineralocorticoid Antagonist Therapies in Patients With Heart Failure and Hyperkalemia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this