Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Paving the path for implementation of clinical genomic sequencing globally: Are we ready?

  • Deborah A Marshall*
  • , Nicolle Hua
  • , James Buchanan
  • , Kurt D Christensen
  • , Geert W J Frederix
  • , Ilias Goranitis
  • , Maarten Ijzerman
  • , Jeroen P Jansen
  • , Tara A Lavelle
  • , Dean A Regier
  • , Hadley S Smith
  • , Wendy J Ungar
  • , Deirdre Weymann
  • , Sarah Wordsworth
  • , Kathryn A Phillips
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • University of Calgary
  • Queen Mary University of London
  • Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute
  • University Medical Centre Utrecht
  • University of Melbourne
  • Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies
  • British Columbia Cancer Research Institute
  • The Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Toronto
  • University of British Columbia
  • University of Oxford
  • University of California

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

17 Citations (Scopus)
66 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Despite the emerging evidence in recent years, successful implementation of clinical genomic sequencing (CGS) remains limited and is challenged by a range of barriers. These include a lack of standardized practices, limited economic assessments for specific indications, limited meaningful patient engagement in health policy decision-making, and the associated costs and resource demand for implementation. Although CGS is gradually becoming more available and accessible worldwide, large variations and disparities remain, and reflections on the lessons learned for successful implementation are sparse. In this commentary, members of the Global Economics and Evaluation of Clinical Genomics Sequencing Working Group (GEECS) describe the global landscape of CGS in the context of health economics and policy and propose evidence-based solutions to address existing and future barriers to CGS implementation. The topics discussed are reflected as two overarching themes: (1) system readiness for CGS and (2) evidence, assessments, and approval processes. These themes highlight the need for health economics, public health, and infrastructure and operational considerations; a robust patient- and family-centered evidence base on CGS outcomes; and a comprehensive, collaborative, interdisciplinary approach.

Original languageEnglish
Article numberqxae053
JournalHealth Affairs Scholar
Volume2
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2024

Bibliographical note

© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Project HOPE - The People-To-People Health Foundation, Inc.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Paving the path for implementation of clinical genomic sequencing globally: Are we ready?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this