Performance of the Prostate Cancer Antigen 3 (PCA3) Gene and Prostate-Specific Antigen in Prescreened Men: Exploring the Value of PCA3 for a First-line Diagnostic Test

Monique Roobol - Bouts, Fritz Schröder, Pim Leeuwen, Tineke Wolters, RCN Bergh, Arno van Leenders, D Hessels

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

146 Citations (Scopus)


Background: The performance characteristics of serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) as a diagnostic test for prostate cancer (PCa) are poor. The performance of the PCa antigen 3 (PCA3) gene as a primary diagnostic is unknown. Objective: Assess the value of PCA3 as a first-line diagnostic test. Design, setting and participants: Participants included men aged 63-75 who were invited for rescreening in the period from September 2007 to February 2009 within the European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer, Rotterdam section. Interventions: Lateral sextant biopsies were performed if the serum PSA value was >= 3.0 ng/ml and/or the PCA3 score was >= 10. Measurements: Measurements included distribution and correlation of PSA value and PCA3 score and their relation to the number of cases and the characteristics of PCa detected. Additional value of PCA3 was included in men with previous negative biopsy and/or PSA <3.0 ng/ml. Results and limitations: In 721 men, all biopsied, 122 PCa cases (16.9%) were detected. Correlation between PSA and PCA3 is poor (Spearman rank correlation: rho = 0.14; p < 0.0001). A PSA >= 3.0 ng/ml misses 64.7% of the total PCa that can be detected with the sextant biopsy technique and 57.9% of serious PCa (T2a or higher and/or Gleason grade >= 4, n = 19), and 68.2% of biopsies could have been avoided; the respective data for PCA3 >= 35 are 32%, 26.3%, and 51.7%. Performance of PCA3 in men with low PSA (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.63) and/or previous negative biopsy (AUC: 0.68) is unclear but has limited reliability due to small numbers. Conclusions: PCA3 as a first-line screening test shows improvement of the performance characteristics and identification of serious disease compared with PSA in this prescreened population. (C) 2010 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B. V. All rights reserved.
Original languageUndefined/Unknown
Pages (from-to)475-481
Number of pages7
JournalEuropean Urology
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Cite this