Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Performance status is the most powerful risk factor for early death among patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group (STBSG) and French Sarcoma Group (FSG) study

  • N Penel
  • , MV Glabbeke
  • , S Mathoulin-Pelissier
  • , I Judson
  • , Stefan Sleijfer
  • , B Bui
  • , P Schoffski
  • , M Ouali
  • , S Marreaud
  • , V Brouste
  • , A Duhamel
  • , P Hohenberger
  • , JY Blay

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

35 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We investigated prognostic factors (PFs) for 90-day mortality in a large cohort of advanced/metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (STS) patients treated with first-line chemotherapy. METHODS: The PFs were identified by both logistic regression analysis and probability tree analysis in patients captured in the Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group (STBSG) database (3002 patients). Scores derived from the logistic regression analysis and algorithms derived from probability tree analysis were subsequently validated in an independent study cohort from the French Sarcoma Group (FSG) database (404 patients). RESULTS: The 90-day mortality rate was 8.6 and 4.5% in both cohorts. The logistic regression analysis retained performance status (PS; odds ratio (OR) = 3.83 if PS = 1, OR = 12.00 if PS >= 2), presence of liver metastasis (OR = 2.37) and rare site metastasis (OR = 2.00) as PFs for early death. The CHAID analysis retained PS as a major discriminator followed by histological grade (only for patients with PS >= 2). In both models, PS was the most powerful PF for 90-day mortality. CONCLUSION: Performance status has to be taken into account in the design of further clinical trials and is one of the most important parameters to guide patient management. For those patients with poor PS, expected benefits from therapy should be weighed up carefully against the anticipated toxicities. British Journal of Cancer (2011) 104, 1544-1550. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2011.136 www.bjcancer.com Published online 19 April 2011 (C) 2011 Cancer Research UK
Original languageUndefined/Unknown
Pages (from-to)1544-1550
Number of pages7
JournalBritish Journal of Cancer
Volume104
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Research programs

  • EMC MM-03-86-01
  • EMC MM-03-86-08

Cite this