Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling of meropenem against VIM-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates: clinical implications

M Tsala, S Vourli, S Kotsakis, GL Daikos, L Tzouvelekis, L Zerva, V Miriagou, Joseph Meletiadis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

VIM-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates are usually associated with high MICs to carbapenems. Preclinical studies investigating the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) characteristics of carbapenems against these isolates are lacking. The in vitro antibacterial activity of meropenem against one WT and three VIM-producing K. pneumoniae clinical isolates (median MICs 0.031, 8, 16 and 128 mg l(-1)) was studied in a dialysis-diffusion PK-PD model and verified in a thigh infection neutropenic animal model by testing selected strains and exposures. The in vitro PK-PD target associated with bactericidal activity was estimated and the target attainment for different dosing regimens was calculated with Monte Carlo analysis. The in vitro model was correlated with the in vivo data, with log(10)CFU/ml reduction of <1 for the VIM-producing (MIC 16 mg l(-1)) and >2 for the WT (MIC 0.031 mg l(-1)) isolates, with %fT >MIC 25 and 100 %, respectively. The in vitro bactericidal activity for all isolates was associated with 40 % fT>MIC and attained in >90 % of cases with the standard 1 g q8 0.5 h infusion dosing regimen only for isolates with MICs up to 1 mg l(-1). For isolates with MICs of 2-8 mg l(-1), prolonged infusion regimens (4 h infusion q8 or 2 h infusion q4) of standard (1 g) and higher (2 g) doses or continuous infusion regimens (3-6 g) are required. For isolates with a MIC of 16 mg l(-1) the unconventional dosing regimen of 2 g as 2 h infusion q4 or 12 g continuous infusion will be required. Prolonged and continuous infusion regimens of meropenem may increase efficacy against VIM-producing K. pneumoniae isolates.
Original languageUndefined/Unknown
Pages (from-to)211-218
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Medical Microbiology
Volume65
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Cite this