TY - JOUR
T1 - Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Modelling in Hemophilia A
T2 - Relating Thrombin and Plasmin Generation to Factor VIII Activity After Administration of a VWF/FVIII Concentrate
AU - Valke, Lars L.F.G.
AU - Cloesmeijer, Michael E.
AU - Mansouritorghabeh, Hassan
AU - Barteling, Wideke
AU - Blijlevens, Nicole M.A.
AU - Cnossen, Marjon H.
AU - Mathôt, Ron A.A.
AU - Schols, Saskia E.M.
AU - van Heerde, Waander L.
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © The Author(s) 2024.
PY - 2024/3
Y1 - 2024/3
N2 - Background: Hemophilia A patients are treated with factor (F) VIII prophylactically to prevent bleeding. In general, dosage and frequency are based on pharmacokinetic measurements. Ideally, an alternative dose adjustment can be based on the hemostatic potential, measured with a thrombin generation assay (TGA), like the Nijmegen hemostasis assay. Objective: The objective of this study was to investigate the predicted performance of a previously developed pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic model for FVIII replacement therapy, relating FVIII dose and FVIII activity levels with thrombin and plasmin generation parameters. Methods: Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic measurements were obtained from 29 severe hemophilia A patients treated with pdVWF/FVIII concentrate (Haemate P®). The predictive performance of the previously developed pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic model was evaluated using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling (NONMEM). When predictions of FVIII activity or TGA parameters were inadequate [median prediction error (MPE) > 20%], a new model was developed. Results: The original pharmacokinetic model underestimated clearance and was refined based on a two-compartment model. The pharmacodynamic model displays no bias in the observed normalized thrombin peak height and normalized thrombin potential (MPE of 6.83% and 7.46%). After re-estimating pharmacodynamic parameters, EC50 and Emax values were relatively comparable between the original model and this group. Prediction of normalized plasmin peak height was inaccurate (MPE 58.9%). Conclusion: Our predictive performance displayed adequate thrombin pharmacodynamic predictions of the original model, but a new pharmacokinetic model was required. The pharmacodynamic model is not factor specific and applicable to multiple factor concentrates. A prospective study is needed to validate the impact of the FVIII dosing pharmacodynamic model on bleeding reduction in patients.
AB - Background: Hemophilia A patients are treated with factor (F) VIII prophylactically to prevent bleeding. In general, dosage and frequency are based on pharmacokinetic measurements. Ideally, an alternative dose adjustment can be based on the hemostatic potential, measured with a thrombin generation assay (TGA), like the Nijmegen hemostasis assay. Objective: The objective of this study was to investigate the predicted performance of a previously developed pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic model for FVIII replacement therapy, relating FVIII dose and FVIII activity levels with thrombin and plasmin generation parameters. Methods: Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic measurements were obtained from 29 severe hemophilia A patients treated with pdVWF/FVIII concentrate (Haemate P®). The predictive performance of the previously developed pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic model was evaluated using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling (NONMEM). When predictions of FVIII activity or TGA parameters were inadequate [median prediction error (MPE) > 20%], a new model was developed. Results: The original pharmacokinetic model underestimated clearance and was refined based on a two-compartment model. The pharmacodynamic model displays no bias in the observed normalized thrombin peak height and normalized thrombin potential (MPE of 6.83% and 7.46%). After re-estimating pharmacodynamic parameters, EC50 and Emax values were relatively comparable between the original model and this group. Prediction of normalized plasmin peak height was inaccurate (MPE 58.9%). Conclusion: Our predictive performance displayed adequate thrombin pharmacodynamic predictions of the original model, but a new pharmacokinetic model was required. The pharmacodynamic model is not factor specific and applicable to multiple factor concentrates. A prospective study is needed to validate the impact of the FVIII dosing pharmacodynamic model on bleeding reduction in patients.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85185101289&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s13318-024-00876-6
DO - 10.1007/s13318-024-00876-6
M3 - Article
C2 - 38367175
AN - SCOPUS:85185101289
SN - 0378-7966
VL - 49
SP - 191
EP - 205
JO - European Journal of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics
JF - European Journal of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics
IS - 2
ER -