Pharmacokinetics of perioperative FVIII in adult patients with haemophilia A: An external validation and development of an alternative population pharmacokinetic model

Jing Zhu, Yi Shuan Wu, Ryan J. Beechinor, Ryan Kemper, Laura H. Bukkems, Ron A.A. Mathôt, Marjon H. Cnossen, Daniel Gonzalez, Sheh Li Chen, Nigel S. Key, Daniel J. Crona*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: Haemophilia A patients require perioperative clotting factor replacement to limit excessive bleeding. Weight-based dosing of Factor VIII (FVIII) does not account for inter-individual pharmacokinetic (PK) variability, and may lead to suboptimal FVIII exposure. Aim: To perform an external validation of a previously developed population PK (popPK) model of perioperative FVIII in haemophilia A patients. Methods: A retrospective chart review identified perioperative haemophilia A patients at the University of North Carolina (UNC) between April 2014 and November 2019. Patient data was used to externally validate a previously published popPK model proposed by Hazendonk. Based on these validation results, a modified popPK model was developed to characterize FVIII PK in our patients. Dosing simulations were performed using this model to compare FVIII target attainment between intermittent bolus (IB) and continuous infusion (CI) administration methods. Results: A total of 521 FVIII concentrations, drawn from 34 patients, were analysed. Validation analyses revealed that the Hazendonk model did not fully capture FVIII PK in the UNC cohort. Therefore, a modified one-compartment model, with weight and age as covariates on clearance (CL), was developed. Dosing simulations revealed that CI resulted in improved target attainment by 16%, with reduced overall FVIII usage by 58 IU/kg, compared to IB. Conclusion: External validation revealed a previously published popPK model of FVIII did not adequately characterize UNC patients, likely due to differences in patient populations. Future prospective studies are needed to evaluate our model prior to implementation into clinical practice.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)974-983
Number of pages10
JournalHaemophilia
Volume27
Issue number6
Early online date17 Aug 2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2021

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
JZ is funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHBLI), grant number 5T32HL007149-44. RJB was funded by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS), grant number T32GM086330. WS was funded by a UNC-Nuventra PK/PD Fellowship.

Funding Information:
JZ is funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHBLI), grant number 5T32HL007149‐44. RJB was funded by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS), grant number T32GM086330. WS was funded by a UNC‐Nuventra PK/PD Fellowship.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Research programs

  • EMC MM-02-54-03

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Pharmacokinetics of perioperative FVIII in adult patients with haemophilia A: An external validation and development of an alternative population pharmacokinetic model'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this