Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Pituitary Society Delphi Survey: An international perspective on endocrine management of patients undergoing transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenomas

  • Nicholas A. Tritos
  • , Pouneh K. Fazeli
  • , the “Pituitary Society Delphi Collaborative Group”
  • , Ann McCormack
  • , Susana M. Mallea-Gil
  • , Maria M. Pineyro
  • , Mirjam Christ-Crain
  • , Stefano Frara
  • , Artak Labadzhyan
  • , Adriana G. Ioachimescu
  • , Ilan Shimon
  • , Yutaka Takahashi
  • , Mark Gurnell*
  • , Maria Fleseriu*
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Massachusetts General Hospital
  • University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine
  • Garvan Institute of Medical Research
  • Hospital Militar Central, Buenos Aires
  • Universidad de la República
  • Universitätsspital Basel
  • Vita-Salute San Raffaele University
  • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
  • Emory University School of Medicine
  • Rabin Medical Center Israel
  • Nara Medical University
  • University of Cambridge
  • Oregon Health and Science University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

19 Citations (Scopus)
34 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Purpose: In adults and children, transsphenoidal surgery (TSS) represents the cornerstone of management for most large or functioning sellar lesions with the exception of prolactinomas. Endocrine evaluation and management are an essential part of perioperative care. However, the details of endocrine assessment and care are not universally agreed upon. Methods: To build consensus on the endocrine evaluation and management of adults undergoing TSS, a Delphi process was used. Thirty-five statements were developed by the Pituitary Society’s Education Committee. Fifty-five pituitary endocrinologists, all members of the Pituitary Society, were invited to participate in two Delphi rounds and rate their extent of agreement with statements pertaining to perioperative endocrine evaluation and management, using a Likert-type scale. Anonymized data on the proportion of panelists’ agreeing with each item were summarized. A list of items that achieved consensus, based on predefined criteria, was tabulated. Results: Strong consensus (≥ 80% of panelists rating their agreement as 6–7 on a scale from 1 to 7) was achieved for 68.6% (24/35) items. If less strict agreement criteria were applied (ratings 5–7 on the Likert-type scale), consensus was achieved for 88% (31/35) items. Conclusions: We achieved consensus on a large majority of items pertaining to perioperative endocrine evaluation and management using a Delphi process. This provides an international real-world clinical perspective from an expert group and facilitates a framework for future guideline development. Some of the items for which consensus was not reached, including the assessment of immediate postoperative remission in acromegaly or Cushing’s disease, represent areas where further research is needed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)64-73
Number of pages10
JournalPituitary
Volume25
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2022

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright: © 2021, The Author(s).

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Pituitary Society Delphi Survey: An international perspective on endocrine management of patients undergoing transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenomas'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this