Plaveiselcelcarcinoom in het hoofd-halsgebied: Standaardexcisie versus Mohs micrografische chirurgie

Translated title of the contribution: Squamous cell carcinoma in the head and neck region: Standard excision versus Mohs micrographic surgery

L. Van Lee, T. Nijsten, H. De Vijlder, M. Wakkee, Renate Van Den Bos*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

It is unclear if Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) leads to fewer recurrences than standard excision for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC). Our retrospective cohort study of 672 patients with cSCC treated with MMS or standard excision showed that the risk of recurrence was 8% after standard excision, which was higher than the 3% after MMS during a median follow-up of 5 years. Remarkably, a considerable number of the recurrences occurred after 2 -5 years after treatment. Preliminary outcomes of our prospective multicenter cohort study show that approximately 15% of standard excisions is incomplete or with a histological margin <2mm. Our findings suggest that MMS might be superior to standard excisions for cSCC of the head and neck.

Translated title of the contributionSquamous cell carcinoma in the head and neck region: Standard excision versus Mohs micrographic surgery
Original languageDutch
Pages (from-to)48-49
Number of pages2
JournalNederlands Tijdschrift voor Dermatologie en Venereologie
Volume28
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2018

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Stichting Beheer Tijdschriften Dermatologie.

Research programs

  • EMC OR-01

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Squamous cell carcinoma in the head and neck region: Standard excision versus Mohs micrographic surgery'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this