TY - JOUR
T1 - Plunging into the process: methodological reflections on a process-oriented study of stakeholders' relating dynamics
AU - Vandenbussche, Lieselot
AU - Edelenbos, Jurian
AU - Eshuis, Jasper
PY - 2018/7/5
Y1 - 2018/7/5
N2 - Process-oriented approaches increasingly gain attention within policy
and administrative studies. A process orientation emphasizes the
ongoing, dynamic character of policy phenomena, i.e. their becoming.
This article reflects upon the methodological particularities and challenges
that come with doing process-oriented research. To do so, it
draws on experiences with a concrete process study on stakeholders’
relating dynamics within a collaborative policymaking process. This
article identifies three methodological particularities: (1) the ongoing
amplification of realities, (2) the shifting of positionalities of both
researchers and participants, through time and across contexts, and
(3) the emergence of historical-aware reflexivity. While each of these
are common issues in qualitative-interpretive research, we argue how
the longitudinal and poly-contextual orientation of a process study
amplifies their impact on the research process and poses specific
challenges. We conclude that to effectively deal with these particularities
and challenges a process researcher benefits from developing
and establishing good field relations, as well as from the courage to
come to ‘temporary’ closure(s), against the background of the continuously
becoming of the phenomenon under study.
AB - Process-oriented approaches increasingly gain attention within policy
and administrative studies. A process orientation emphasizes the
ongoing, dynamic character of policy phenomena, i.e. their becoming.
This article reflects upon the methodological particularities and challenges
that come with doing process-oriented research. To do so, it
draws on experiences with a concrete process study on stakeholders’
relating dynamics within a collaborative policymaking process. This
article identifies three methodological particularities: (1) the ongoing
amplification of realities, (2) the shifting of positionalities of both
researchers and participants, through time and across contexts, and
(3) the emergence of historical-aware reflexivity. While each of these
are common issues in qualitative-interpretive research, we argue how
the longitudinal and poly-contextual orientation of a process study
amplifies their impact on the research process and poses specific
challenges. We conclude that to effectively deal with these particularities
and challenges a process researcher benefits from developing
and establishing good field relations, as well as from the courage to
come to ‘temporary’ closure(s), against the background of the continuously
becoming of the phenomenon under study.
U2 - 10.1080/19460171.2018.1488596
DO - 10.1080/19460171.2018.1488596
M3 - Article
SN - 1946-0171
VL - 14
SP - 1
EP - 20
JO - Critical Policy Studies
JF - Critical Policy Studies
IS - 1
ER -