Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

PRECISE Version 2: Updated Recommendations for Reporting Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients on Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer

  • Cameron Englman
  • , Davide Maffei
  • , Clare Allen
  • , Alex Kirkham
  • , Peter Albertsen
  • , Veeru Kasivisvanathan
  • , Ronaldo Hueb Baroni
  • , Alberto Briganti
  • , Pieter De Visschere
  • , Louise Dickinson
  • , Juan Gómez Rivas
  • , Masoom A. Haider
  • , Claudia Kesch
  • , Stacy Loeb
  • , Katarzyna J. Macura
  • , Daniel Margolis
  • , Anita M. Mitra
  • , Anwar R. Padhani
  • , Valeria Panebianco
  • , Peter A. Pinto
  • Guillaume Ploussard, Philippe Puech, Andrei S. Purysko, Jan Philipp Radtke, Antti Rannikko, Art Rastinehad, Raphaele Renard-Penna, Francesco Sanguedolce, Lars Schimmöller, Ivo G. Schoots, Shahrokh F. Shariat, Nicola Schieda, Clare M. Tempany, Baris Turkbey, Massimo Valerio, Arnauld Villers, Jochen Walz, Tristan Barrett, Francesco Giganti*, Caroline M. Moore
*Corresponding author for this work
  • University College London
  • University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
  • Humanitas University
  • University of Connecticut
  • Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein
  • IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele
  • Vita-Salute San Raffaele University
  • Ghent University Hospital
  • Hospital Clínico San Carlos de Madrid
  • Sinai Health
  • University Hospital Essen
  • New York University
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • Cornell University
  • The Hillingdon Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
  • University of Rome La Sapienza
  • National Cancer Institute (Bethesda, Md)
  • La Croix du Sud Hospital
  • Université de Lille
  • Cleveland Clinic Foundation
  • Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
  • University of Helsinki
  • Lenox Hill Hospital
  • Assistance publique – Hôpitaux de Paris
  • Autonomous University of Barcelona
  • University of Sassari
  • Ruhr University Bochum
  • Medical University of Vienna
  • University of Jordan
  • University of Ottawa
  • Harvard University
  • University Hospital of Geneva
  • Institut Paoli Calmettes
  • University of Cambridge

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

76 Citations (Scopus)
77 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background and objective: The Prostate Cancer Radiological Estimation of Change in Sequential Evaluation (PRECISE) recommendations standardise the reporting of prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients on active surveillance (AS) for prostate cancer. An international consensus group recently updated these recommendations and identified the areas of uncertainty. Methods: A panel of 38 experts used the formal RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method consensus methodology. Panellists scored 193 statements using a 1–9 agreement scale, where 9 means full agreement. A summary of agreement, uncertainty, or disagreement (derived from the group median score) and consensus (determined using the Interpercentile Range Adjusted for Symmetry method) was calculated for each statement and presented for discussion before individual rescoring. Key findings and limitations: Participants agreed that MRI scans must meet a minimum image quality standard (median 9) or be given a score of ‘X’ for insufficient quality. The current scan should be compared with both baseline and previous scans (median 9), with the PRECISE score being the maximum from any lesion (median 8). PRECISE 3 (stable MRI) was subdivided into 3-V (visible) and 3-NonV (nonvisible) disease (median 9). Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System/Likert ≥3 lesions should be measured on T2-weighted imaging, using other sequences to aid in the identification (median 8), and whenever possible, reported pictorially (diagrams, screenshots, or contours; median 9). There was no consensus on how to measure tumour size. More research is needed to determine a significant size increase (median 9). PRECISE 5 was clarified as progression to stage ≥T3a (median 9). Conclusions and clinical implications: The updated PRECISE recommendations reflect expert consensus opinion on minimal standards and reporting criteria for prostate MRI in AS.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)240-255
Number of pages16
JournalEuropean Urology
Volume86
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright: © 2024 The Author(s)

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'PRECISE Version 2: Updated Recommendations for Reporting Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients on Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this