Prediction Models for Future High-Need High-Cost Healthcare Use: a Systematic Review

Ursula W. de Ruijter, Z. L.Rana Kaplan*, Wichor M. Bramer, Frank Eijkenaar, Daan Nieboer, Agnes van der Heide, Hester F. Lingsma, Willem A. Bax

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)
41 Downloads (Pure)


Background: In an effort to improve both quality of care and cost-effectiveness, various care-management programmes have been developed for high-need high-cost (HNHC) patients. Early identification of patients at risk of becoming HNHC (i.e. case finding) is crucial to a programme’s success. We aim to systematically identify prediction models predicting future HNHC healthcare use in adults, to describe their predictive performance and to assess their applicability. Methods: Ovid MEDLINE® All, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science and Google Scholar were systematically searched from inception through January 31, 2021. Risk of bias and methodological quality assessment was performed through the Prediction model Risk Of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST). Results: Of 5890 studies, 60 studies met inclusion criteria. Within these studies, 313 unique models were presented using a median development cohort size of 20,248 patients (IQR 5601–174,242). Predictors were derived from a combination of data sources, most often claims data (n = 37; 62%) and patient survey data (n = 29; 48%). Most studies (n = 36; 60%) estimated patients’ risk to become part of some top percentage of the cost distribution (top-1–20%) within a mean time horizon of 16 months (range 12–60). Five studies (8%) predicted HNHC persistence over multiple years. Model validation was performed in 45 studies (76%). Model performance in terms of both calibration and discrimination was reported in 14 studies (23%). Overall risk of bias was rated as ‘high’ in 40 studies (67%), mostly due to a ‘high’ risk of bias in the subdomain ‘Analysis’ (n = 37; 62%). Discussion: This is the first systematic review (PROSPERO CRD42020164734) of non-proprietary prognostic models predicting HNHC healthcare use. Meta-analysis was not possible due to heterogeneity. Most identified models estimated a patient’s risk to incur high healthcare expenditure during the subsequent year. However, case-finding strategies for HNHC care-management programmes are best informed by a model predicting HNHC persistence. Therefore, future studies should not only focus on validating and extending existing models, but also concentrate on clinical usefulness.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1763-1770
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of General Internal Medicine
Issue number7
Publication statusPublished - 11 Jan 2022

Bibliographical note

The authors would like to thank Ms. Marjan Bakker (medical information specialist at Northwest Clinics Alkmaar) for her support in drafting the initial search strategy.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Author(s).


Dive into the research topics of 'Prediction Models for Future High-Need High-Cost Healthcare Use: a Systematic Review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this