TY - JOUR
T1 - Predictors and risk model for positive circumferential resection margin after robot-assisted total mesorectal excision
T2 - retrospective cohort study
AU - Geitenbeek, Ritch T.J.
AU - Burghgraef, Thijs A.
AU - Duhoky, Rauand
AU - Fleming, Christina A.
AU - Moussion, Aurore
AU - Bouazza, Nabila
AU - Cotte, Eddy
AU - Dubois, Anne
AU - Rullier, Eric
AU - Denost, Quentin
AU - Rouanet, Philippe
AU - Khan, Jim
AU - Hompes, Roel
AU - Consten, Esther C.J.
AU - EUREKA study group
AU - Van Acker, G. J.D.
AU - Aukema, T. S.
AU - Belgers, H. J.
AU - Beverdam, F. H.
AU - Bloemen, J. G.
AU - Bosscha, K.
AU - Breukink, S. O.
AU - Coene, P. P.L.O.
AU - Crolla, R. M.P.H.
AU - Van Duijvendijk, P.
AU - Van Duyn, E. B.
AU - Faneyte, I. F.
AU - Fransen, S. A.F.
AU - Van Geloven, A. A.W.
AU - Gerhards, M. F.
AU - Van Grevenstein, W. M.U.
AU - Havenga, K.
AU - De Hingh, I. H.J.T.
AU - Hoff, C.
AU - Kats, G.
AU - Leijtens, J. W.A.
AU - Lutke Holzik, M. F.
AU - Melenhorst, J.
AU - Poelman, M. M.
AU - Pronk, A.
AU - Schiphorst, A. H.W.
AU - Schreinemakers, J. M.J.
AU - Sietses, C.
AU - Smits, A. B.
AU - Somers, I.
AU - Spillenaar Bilgen, E. J.
AU - Stockmann, H. B.A.C.
AU - Talsma, A. K.
AU - Tanis, P. J.
AU - Verdaasdonk, E. G.G.
AU - Zimmerman, D. D.E.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of BJS Foundation Ltd.
PY - 2025/6/1
Y1 - 2025/6/1
N2 - Background: Positive circumferential resection margin (CRM) after total mesorectal excision (TME) is associated with higher local and systemic recurrence rates, affecting overall survival in patients with rectal cancer. Although risk factors for positive CRM have been identified for open, laparoscopic, and transanal TME, these may differ for robot-assisted total mesorectal excision (R-TME). This study aimed to assess the incidence of positive CRM following R-TME and identify the associated preoperative risk factors. Method: An international multicentre retrospective study included patients receiving R-TME between January 2013 and January 2022 in centres based in the Netherlands, UK, and France. Endpoints were the incidence of and predictive factors for positive CRM. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed, and factors associated with positive CRM were then assessed by formulating a predictive model. Results: A total of 1390 patients underwent R-TME, and the incidence of positive CRM was 6.0% (n = 83). Multivariable analysis revealed significant associations between positive CRM and cT4 tumours (OR 2.27), involved mesorectal fascia on staging magnetic resonance imaging at diagnosis (OR 1.89), and non-sphincter-saving surgery (OR 2.22). The predictive model exhibited satisfactory discrimination (area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve > 0.7) and predicted a 26% risk of positive CRM when all identified risk factors were present. Conclusion: Preoperative tumour- and procedure-related factors, rather than patient-related factors, are associated with CRM involvement after R-TME. The proposed predictive model allows preoperative calculation of the risk of positive CRM, offering valuable insights for optimizing patient selection and tailoring treatment approaches to enhance oncological outcomes.
AB - Background: Positive circumferential resection margin (CRM) after total mesorectal excision (TME) is associated with higher local and systemic recurrence rates, affecting overall survival in patients with rectal cancer. Although risk factors for positive CRM have been identified for open, laparoscopic, and transanal TME, these may differ for robot-assisted total mesorectal excision (R-TME). This study aimed to assess the incidence of positive CRM following R-TME and identify the associated preoperative risk factors. Method: An international multicentre retrospective study included patients receiving R-TME between January 2013 and January 2022 in centres based in the Netherlands, UK, and France. Endpoints were the incidence of and predictive factors for positive CRM. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed, and factors associated with positive CRM were then assessed by formulating a predictive model. Results: A total of 1390 patients underwent R-TME, and the incidence of positive CRM was 6.0% (n = 83). Multivariable analysis revealed significant associations between positive CRM and cT4 tumours (OR 2.27), involved mesorectal fascia on staging magnetic resonance imaging at diagnosis (OR 1.89), and non-sphincter-saving surgery (OR 2.22). The predictive model exhibited satisfactory discrimination (area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve > 0.7) and predicted a 26% risk of positive CRM when all identified risk factors were present. Conclusion: Preoperative tumour- and procedure-related factors, rather than patient-related factors, are associated with CRM involvement after R-TME. The proposed predictive model allows preoperative calculation of the risk of positive CRM, offering valuable insights for optimizing patient selection and tailoring treatment approaches to enhance oncological outcomes.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105006534432
U2 - 10.1093/bjsopen/zraf027
DO - 10.1093/bjsopen/zraf027
M3 - Article
C2 - 40402814
AN - SCOPUS:105006534432
SN - 2474-9842
VL - 9
JO - BJS open
JF - BJS open
IS - 3
M1 - zraf027
ER -